2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.05.046
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of crisaborole ointment, a novel, nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in children and adults

Abstract: Crisaborole demonstrated a favorable safety profile and improvement in all measures of efficacy, including overall disease severity, pruritus, and other signs of AD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
345
0
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 463 publications
(387 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
9
345
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Time to success in the ISGA score was significantly shorter in the crisaborole-treated group than in those treated with vehicle. Lastly, the individual score tool (signs of AD scale) revealed a significant reduction in the severity of AD signs, and the twice-daily pruritus severity scoring showed a swift (significant after 8 days) and sustainable improvement in pruritus [60]. However, to summarize the bulk of data on topically administered crisaborole, the difference of approximately 10% in both the ISGA success rate and the improvement score of pruritus between crisaboroleand placebo-treated subjects is modest, and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was not defined for the reported outcome measure.…”
Section: Crisaborolementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Time to success in the ISGA score was significantly shorter in the crisaborole-treated group than in those treated with vehicle. Lastly, the individual score tool (signs of AD scale) revealed a significant reduction in the severity of AD signs, and the twice-daily pruritus severity scoring showed a swift (significant after 8 days) and sustainable improvement in pruritus [60]. However, to summarize the bulk of data on topically administered crisaborole, the difference of approximately 10% in both the ISGA success rate and the improvement score of pruritus between crisaboroleand placebo-treated subjects is modest, and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was not defined for the reported outcome measure.…”
Section: Crisaborolementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, these conclusions on efficacy should be cautiously interpreted. In contrast, the two phase III trials completed in 2015 were published in late 2016 and evaluated in parallel [60]. The two identically designed, vehicle-controlled, double-blind studies enrolled and randomly assigned (2: 1, crisaborole:vehicle) patients aged 2 years or older with an Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) score of mild or moderate for twice-daily application for 28 days.…”
Section: Crisaborolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2 identically designed studies, more crisaborole- than vehicle-treated patients achieved investigator’s static global assessment (ISGA) success (clear/almost clear with ≥2-grade improvement) [159]. …”
Section: Therapeutic Management Of Admentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The study populations (n=759 in AD-301 and n=763 in AD-302) included patients 2 years of age and older, with an average age of 12 years across both studies (range, 2-80 years). About one-third of the enrolled patients had mild AD and the rest had moderate disease, based on an Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) score.…”
Section: Crisaborolementioning
confidence: 99%