Efficacy and Safety of CT-Guided Kidney Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Glomerular Diseases in Complicated Patients

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Kidney biopsy is the cornerstone for the diagnosis of glomerular diseases and to guide treatment. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy is currently the gold standard to obtain cortical specimens. However, in cases where ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy is not deemed safe (obese patients, deep kidneys, or kidneys with a complicated anatomy), CT-guided kidney biopsy could be a convenient alternative to obtain renal tissue samples. The aim of this study was to describe the diagnostic yield and complications of CT-guided kidney biopsies in patients with glomerular diseases that were previously discarded for ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy. <b><i>Material and Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective, single-center, observational study including patients who underwent CT-guided native kidney biopsies in our center after being contraindicated for ultrasound-guided biopsy. Patients’ records were reviewed retrieving baseline characteristics and pre-biopsy clinical, laboratory parameters and concomitant medication. The biopsy needle gauge, site of puncture, and number of needle passes were recorded. The diagnostic yield was evaluated by the number of glomeruli obtained, the rate of specimens that were adequate to reach diagnosis, and the number of biopsies that had to be repeated. Complications were defined as minor (hypotension, hematoma) and major (arteriovenous fistulae, major bleeding requiring embolization, or nephrectomy). The diagnostic yield and complications were compared to ultrasound-guided native kidney biopsies performed during the same period. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 56 CT-guided native kidney biopsies were performed during the study period. The number of glomeruli obtained per patient was 11.5 ± 6.3, which was inferior to that obtained from ultrasound-guided biopsies (14.08 ± 8.47, <i>p</i> < 0.05). However, the rate of specimens that were adequate to reach a diagnosis was similar (92.9% vs. 90.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.437). The number of needle passes was higher in CT-guided kidney biopsies (2.0 ± 0.7 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5, <i>p</i> < 0.05), as well as the incidence of post-biopsy perirenal asymptomatic hematomas (66.1% vs. 24.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). There were no significant differences in other post-biopsy minor complications (1.8% vs. 2.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.621). There were no major complications after CT-guided kidney biopsies. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> CT-guided percutaneous kidney biopsy is a valid alternative for the diagnosis of glomerular diseases in patients with special characteristics such as obesity or deep kidneys that contraindicate ultrasound-guided biopsy. In this population, CT-guided kidney biopsies are safe and provide a high diagnostic yield, reaching a diagnosis in >90% of patients that had been previously discarded for ultrasound-guided biopsy.

Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic renal biopsy: a single-center review and meta-analysis

“…In the study conducted by Javier Vian and colleagues, it showed a similar diagnostic rate to that of PKB (92.9% vs. 90.8%, p = 0.437). Additionally, there was no significant increase in the incidence of severe complications, including post-biopsy hypotension (1.8% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.621) and blood transfusion (0% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.122) [ 12 ]. Moreover, it demonstrated excellent sensitivity in detecting small perinephric hematomas.…”

Renal Biopsy for Diagnosis in Kidney Disease: Indication, Technique, and Safety

“…In rare cases, when the kidney cannot be adequately visualized by ultrasound, e.g., in cases of extreme obesity, or in instances of complicated anatomy, e.g., bilateral cysts, the biopsy can alternatively be performed CT-guided [74,75]. CT guidance may allow a more precise biopsy needle placement in individual cases and has been shown to provide a high diagnostic yield in patients previously rejected for an ultrasound-guided biopsy [76].…”