2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.clicom.2022.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of current treatments for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment options for PNH often include supportive care, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and complement inhibitors. The FDA has approved three complement inhibitors to treat PNH in recent years: Eculizumab, in 2007; Ravulizumab, in 2018; and Pegcetacoplan, in 2021. have shown that Ravulizumab and Pegcetacoplan are non-inferior drugs compared to the first standardized treatment in efficacy and safety profile [47]. However, Pegcetacoplan is often overlooked in available CPGs, possibly due to its recent approval and the higher amount of evidence for Eculizumab and Ravulizumab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment options for PNH often include supportive care, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and complement inhibitors. The FDA has approved three complement inhibitors to treat PNH in recent years: Eculizumab, in 2007; Ravulizumab, in 2018; and Pegcetacoplan, in 2021. have shown that Ravulizumab and Pegcetacoplan are non-inferior drugs compared to the first standardized treatment in efficacy and safety profile [47]. However, Pegcetacoplan is often overlooked in available CPGs, possibly due to its recent approval and the higher amount of evidence for Eculizumab and Ravulizumab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several systematic reviews have been conducted previously on complement inhibitors for PNH treatment, [16][17][18] they have focused on individual substances or provided a descriptive review of results from clinical trials. No systematic reviews, including those of ravulizumab, have been conducted.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have been conducted to obtain regulatory approval for complement inhibitors, their sample sizes are relatively small, and the comparative efficacy data are restricted to a 26-week randomization period. [11][12][13][14][15] Although several systematic reviews on specific complement inhibitors exist, [16][17][18] a comprehensive analysis of short-and long-term efficacy data for all available treatments using unified criteria is still lacking. Considering that clinical trials of rare diseases have limited sample sizes, a comprehensive approach is required to establish optimal treatment strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%