2020
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local wound infiltration anaesthesia: A meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis of 23 randomised controlled trials

Abstract: To further identify the real efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local wound infiltration anaesthesia, we conducted this meta‐analysis. The systematic search strategy was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases. As a result, a total of 23 RCTs (1445 patients) were included. Patients receiving dexmedetomidine combined with local anaesthetics had a lower rescue analgesia rate [risk ratio (RR): 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36‐0.65] and lower rescue ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors have stated that USRA is much more time-consuming compared with the easy-to-perform intraoperative LIA technique, resulting in fewer possible TKAs on a surgery day than usual when performing USRA [ 9 , 11 , 16 , 17 ]. In addition, LIA appears to be a more cost-effective technique [ 21 ]. Regarding adverse effects of dexmedetomidine for LIA or USRA, we no evidence for the concentration used could be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors have stated that USRA is much more time-consuming compared with the easy-to-perform intraoperative LIA technique, resulting in fewer possible TKAs on a surgery day than usual when performing USRA [ 9 , 11 , 16 , 17 ]. In addition, LIA appears to be a more cost-effective technique [ 21 ]. Regarding adverse effects of dexmedetomidine for LIA or USRA, we no evidence for the concentration used could be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the potential of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to LIA has not been investigated. If a dexmedetomidine-supplemented LIA could similarly enhance the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine and prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia after TKA, as has already been described for wound infiltration, then this would be another strong argument for the use of LIA instead of USRA [ 15 , 21 ]. Thus, the primary goal of the present study was to evaluate dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to LIA in TKA, when compared to the effect of single-shot femoral and popliteal blocks, both combined with dexmedetomidine, on postoperative opioid consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strengths of this meta-analysis include a pre-registered protocol, the comprehensive search strategy, and conservative GRADE assessment of certainty of evidence. The results were cautiously interpreted in the context of clinically important differences [32,55,56], allowing a meaningful estimate of the efficacy of methoxyflurane. Additionally, the adjusted statistical threshold for primary outcomes served to reduce the risk of type I error and multiple testing bias [32,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all continuous outcomes in this review, a mean and standard difference (SD) was extracted. The mean and SD were approximated using the median and interquartile range if its value was not available 13,14 . Besides, The GetData Graph Digitizer Software was used to generate the data in graphical form (GetData Pty Ltd., Kogarah, Australia).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%