2019
DOI: 10.1159/000501552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in Nonagenarians

Abstract: Introduction: Increased life expectancy results in a rapid increase of nonagenarian patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). We conducted this study to assess the efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy (ET) in this age group with use of imaging-based selection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and imaging data from 2 different comprehensive stroke centers and compared the outcomes of ET versus intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) alone among … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although advanced age was reported to be associated with an increased tortuosity of the cerebral vasculature that increase technical difficulty of mechanical thrombecomy and resulting less complete recanalization, the use of latest generation of device can result in less complication. 9 The first-line mechanical thrombectomy device strategy either stent retriever, contact aspiration, or either combination of both did not give significance in achieving successful reperfusion. 7…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although advanced age was reported to be associated with an increased tortuosity of the cerebral vasculature that increase technical difficulty of mechanical thrombecomy and resulting less complete recanalization, the use of latest generation of device can result in less complication. 9 The first-line mechanical thrombectomy device strategy either stent retriever, contact aspiration, or either combination of both did not give significance in achieving successful reperfusion. 7…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Intracranial hemorrhage within 24 hours occurred in 24-28% patients but only 4-8% considered as symptomatic, and there was no difference rates between patients with and without successful reperfusion. 6,7, 9 When compared with thrombolysis alone, nonagenarian patients who got endovascular treatment have lower NIHSS score at discharge, better mRS score at 90 days after procedure, and less symptomatic ICH. Although advanced age was reported to be associated with an increased tortuosity of the cerebral vasculature that increase technical difficulty of mechanical thrombecomy and resulting less complete recanalization, the use of latest generation of device can result in less complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to integrate the expanding indications since 2015, with EVT progressively being considered for increasingly older patients, more extensive ischemic cores and later time-windows. [34][35][36] The evidence of a preserved therapeutic benefit in these subgroups, usually associated with an a priori poorer prognosis, is likely to have influenced the clinical outcome over the study period. Furthermore, IVT rates have decreased markedly over the years in the observed population of EVT treated patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASPECTS is a strong predictor of good functional outcome irrespective of age (multilevel OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11–1.26, p < 0.001). By using FLAIR-DWI mismatch selection criteria, Wu et al [25]achieved a 71.4% rate of good outcome in nonagenarians. Kaeshmacher found that in patients <80 years old presenting with ASPECTS 0-5, who were treated with mechanical thrombectomy, successful reperfusion was beneficial without increasing the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our series, only 12.7% of nonagenarians achieved a good functional outcome at 90 days after the procedure with a mortality of 46.5%. Based on small retrospective cohorts, other studies have reported good functional outcomes ranging from 13 to 71.4% and mortality rates ranging from 7.7 to 71.6% [9, 13, 25, 33-38] with the best results occurring in series with highly selected patients [37] and strict inclusion criteria based on advanced imaging [36, 38]. Despite the relatively poor outcomes in very elderly patients in this series, these results should be interpreted in the context of the dismal natural history of acute ischemic stroke in this patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%