2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.754881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Fruquintinib Plus PD-1 Inhibitors Versus Regorafenib Plus PD-1 Inhibitors in Refractory Microsatellite Stable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: BackgroundMicrosatellite stability (MSS) or mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Studies have shown that antiangiogenic drugs combined with programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors can improve immunosuppression. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of fruquintinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor (FP) and regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitor (RP) in the treatment of advanced mCRC with MSS or pMMR.Materials and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a large cohort was warranted to further evaluate the role of RAS mutation in mCRC. Besides, with limited studies assessing the efficacy of fruquintinib‐combined therapy, a retrospective study indicated that fruquintinib prolonged the survival of patients with MSS mCRC than regorafenib though only 51 patients were included in this study (fruquintinb cohort, n = 28; regorafenib cohort, n = 23) 16 . However, no significant difference was observed in our study (fruquintinb cohort, n = 29; regorafenib cohort, n = 51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Thus, a large cohort was warranted to further evaluate the role of RAS mutation in mCRC. Besides, with limited studies assessing the efficacy of fruquintinib‐combined therapy, a retrospective study indicated that fruquintinib prolonged the survival of patients with MSS mCRC than regorafenib though only 51 patients were included in this study (fruquintinb cohort, n = 28; regorafenib cohort, n = 23) 16 . However, no significant difference was observed in our study (fruquintinb cohort, n = 29; regorafenib cohort, n = 51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Among them, the microenvironment of the liver may be more suitable for the survival of SCLC cells with neuroendocrine characteristics, which may be related to the high propensity of SCLC to develop liver metastasis 82 . The liver is an immunosuppressed organ when liver metastases occur, therefore the efficacy of ICIs can be diminished by a decrease in immune response in both liver metastases and primary hepatocellular carcinoma 83,84 . Tumeh et al 85 observed a significant reduction in the density of CD8 + T cells at the margins of liver metastatic tumors in melanoma patients, which is one of the reasons for the decreased immune response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Wilhelm et al, 2011 ) Regorafenib is mainly transformed into active metabolites M-2 and M-5, thus inhibiting multiple kinases, including VEGFR 1–3, KIT, PDGFR-alpha/beta, FGFR1/2, RET, etc. ( Ettrich and Seufferlein, 2018 ) Up to now, regorafenib has been widely utilized to treatment colorectal cancer, especially metastatic colorectal cancer ( Van Cutsem et al, 2019 ; Sun et al, 2021 ). An international clinical trial was performed to test the efficacy of regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer progressing after all approved standard therapies and found the median overall survival was 6.4 months in the regorafenib group while that of placebo group was 5.0 months ( Grothey et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%