2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2011.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of high dose versus low dose streptokinase for treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] An additional 16 studies compared different types of thrombolytic agents, and included a total of 1244 patients (supplemental Appendix 5). [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] One study (Ultrasound-Accelerated Thrombolysis of Pulmonary Embolism [ULTIMA] trial) investigated catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), and enrolled a total of 59 patients. 42 All studies were randomized, but only 7 were clearly blinded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] An additional 16 studies compared different types of thrombolytic agents, and included a total of 1244 patients (supplemental Appendix 5). [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] One study (Ultrasound-Accelerated Thrombolysis of Pulmonary Embolism [ULTIMA] trial) investigated catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), and enrolled a total of 59 patients. 42 All studies were randomized, but only 7 were clearly blinded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent network meta-analysis evaluated 4 trials (1720) (298 patients) that compared low dose to standard dose thrombolysis (21). In this meta-analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in overall mortality (OR 0.96, 95% CI, 0.23-4.17), or major bleeding, although low dose showed a nonsignificant trend towards reduced major bleeding events (OR 0.44, 95% CI, 0.15-1.28), which needs to be confirmed in larger studies.…”
Section: Aggressive Treatment Of Intermediate-risk Pulmonary Embolismmentioning
confidence: 99%