2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of intensified antiplatelet therapy on the basis of platelet reactivity testing in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
73
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis of 10 randomized clinical trials in which an intensified antiplatelet protocol based on adenosine diphosphate-specific platelet-reactivity testing was used found that the intensified protocol was associated with lower mortality and myocardial infarction rates; however, the benefit of intensified antiplatelet therapy was highly dependent on the patient's initial risk of stent thrombosis. 19 In a recent position paper by the Working Group of the European Society of Cardiology, high platelet reactivity (resistance to clopidogrel) was recognized as a marker for a high event rate during coronary intervention, especially during acute myocardial infarct intervention. 20 The use of alternative second antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel and ticagrelor has been recommended in such cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of 10 randomized clinical trials in which an intensified antiplatelet protocol based on adenosine diphosphate-specific platelet-reactivity testing was used found that the intensified protocol was associated with lower mortality and myocardial infarction rates; however, the benefit of intensified antiplatelet therapy was highly dependent on the patient's initial risk of stent thrombosis. 19 In a recent position paper by the Working Group of the European Society of Cardiology, high platelet reactivity (resistance to clopidogrel) was recognized as a marker for a high event rate during coronary intervention, especially during acute myocardial infarct intervention. 20 The use of alternative second antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel and ticagrelor has been recommended in such cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the benefit of the intensified treatment was meaningful for patients at high risk of ST, while disappeared in low-risk individuals. The authors of the article also stated that the aggregometry approach is also more economical due to the high costs of administering new-generation ADP receptor antagonists [15].…”
Section: Evidence For Aggregometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HPR patients exhibit a higher risk for ischaemic events including stent thrombosis (7,8,13). Platelet function testing (PFT) allows to monitor individual platelet reactivity and to adjust antiplatelet regimens potentially improving outcomes of HPR patients (17). Nevertheless, prior randomised trials (18)(19)(20) failed to show a clinical superiority of a PFT-guided antiplatelet therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%