2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2020.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of neural stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury: A systematic literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides neuron replacement, neural stem cells can differentiate into glial cells, which play a vital role in the brain's immune response and may be affected by the FTD. The differentiation of the neurological stem cells into glial cells may reduce inflammation and promote restoration of brain function (142). Despite the promising results of animal studies, neural stem cell therapy is still experimental, and its efficacy and safety in human clinical trials are yet to be determined.…”
Section: Neural Stem Cell Therapy For Frontotemporal Dementiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides neuron replacement, neural stem cells can differentiate into glial cells, which play a vital role in the brain's immune response and may be affected by the FTD. The differentiation of the neurological stem cells into glial cells may reduce inflammation and promote restoration of brain function (142). Despite the promising results of animal studies, neural stem cell therapy is still experimental, and its efficacy and safety in human clinical trials are yet to be determined.…”
Section: Neural Stem Cell Therapy For Frontotemporal Dementiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low number of studies and small sample sizes across the studies invariably limits the quality of evidence for safety and efficacy outcomes for NSC therapy on review. Whilst a limited number of phase I/IIa clinical trials currently exist, Tiwari et al ( 91 ) conclude the safety of NSC transplantation for SCI in humans in a systematic review. The conclusions from the systematic review largely indicate the safety and tolerability of NSC transplantation, albeit the lack of a quantitative assessment of adverse events and serious adverse events across the studies.…”
Section: Stem Cell Therapy As the Basis For Combinatorial Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on their potential advantages, NSCs have been tested in phase I/IIa clinical trials for SCI cell therapy, which have been identified in the literature and listed below:• Shin et al (87), n = 19 • Ghobrial et al (88), n = 5 • Curtis et al (89), n = 4 • Levi et al (90), n = 31The low number of studies and small sample sizes across the studies invariably limits the quality of evidence for safety and efficacy outcomes for NSC therapy on review. Whilst a limited number of phase I/IIa clinical trials currently exist, Tiwari et al(91) conclude the safety of NSC transplantation for SCI…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%