2016
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8227(16)31024-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily insulin glargine in insulin-naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semaglutide was generally well tolerated and reported side effects were consistent with other semaglutide trials . No unexpected treatment‐related safety issues were identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Semaglutide was generally well tolerated and reported side effects were consistent with other semaglutide trials . No unexpected treatment‐related safety issues were identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This interpretation is supported by similar GIRs in the two arms and the similar rates of glucose recovery. Furthermore, in the studies of semaglutide conducted to date, no increases in rates of hypoglycaemia have been noted, although these (and indeed the present study) were not powered to evaluate differences in severe hypoglycaemia; [14][15][16]34 however, in the LEADER trial with the closely-related molecule, liraglutide, a statistically significantly lower incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was seen for liraglutide compared with placebo. 35 In summary, the clinical relevance of the observations in the present trial remains uncertain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations