2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10143043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatments: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract: Although a range of pharmacological interventions is available, it remains uncertain which treatment for osteoporosis is more effective. This network meta-analysis study aimed to compare different drug efficacy and safety in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Clinicaltrial.gov, Cochrane library, Google scholar were searched up to 31 October 2020. Randomized placebo-controlled trials that reported measures of bone mineral density (BMD) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For evaluating safety of BP, rate of adverse events including cancer, cardiovascular disease, death and osteonecrosis of the jaw will be included. 13 …”
Section: Study Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For evaluating safety of BP, rate of adverse events including cancer, cardiovascular disease, death and osteonecrosis of the jaw will be included. 13 …”
Section: Study Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For evaluating safety of BP, rate of adverse events including cancer, cardiovascular disease, death and osteonecrosis of the jaw will be included. 13 Search strategies for the identification of studies Electronic searches The following electronic databases will be searched from inception to December 2021: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The specific search strategies (for example, PubMed) are listed in box 1.…”
Section: Types Of Interventions and Comparatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Efficacy of all these drugs compared to calcium plus vitamin D alone or, for some of these, against active comparators, has been broadly demonstrated in clinical trials. 2 However, robust data on effectiveness of one treatment over another are still lacking. 3 Indeed, real-life studies are commonly flawed by confounding by indication bias and protopathic bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the parameters on the quality of bone collagen, and bone microarchitecture, crucial for bone strength evaluation, may remain inconclusive. So far, most of the clinical studies of osteoporosis treatments, evaluated fracture risk as a parameter of therapeutic effect, but comparing the incidence of fractures regardless of the incidence of trauma or fall down ( 1 , 8 ). One possible approach for example, to assess the clear reduction of fracture risk in a treatment regimen may be within a long-term follow-up where the probability of potential fallings is increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%