Aim: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis,
evaluating the safety and efficacy of Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl
hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) among dialysis chronic kidney disease
(CKD) patients. Methods: Safety was evaluated with any adverse events
(AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and twelve common events. Efficacy
was mainly analyzed with hemoglobin (Hb) response. All reported results
were summarized using mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) with 95%
confidence interval (CI). Publication bias was assessed through funnel
plots. Results: Twenty trials with 14,947 participants were included,
comparing six HIF-PHIs with Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). No
significant differences were indicated in AEs and SAEs between each
HIF-PHI and ESA. The occurrence of gastrointestinal disorder was higher
in Enarodustat and Roxadustat than in ESAs (RR: 6.92, 95% CI:
1.52-31.40, p=0.01; RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.04-1.61, P=0.02). The
occurrence of hypertension was lower in Vadadustat than in ESAs (RR:
0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0.96, p=0.01). The occurrence of vascular-access
complications was higher in Roxadustat (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04-1.27,
p<0.01) while lower in Daprodustat (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.66-0.92,
p<0.01) than in ESAs. In the risk of the other nine events, including
cardiovascular events, no significant differences were observed between
HIF-PHIs and ESAs. For efficacy, network meta-analysis showed that the
overall performance was similar to ESAs. Conclusion: Although HIF-PHIs
did not show significant differences from ESAs in terms of overall AEs
and SAEs, statistical differences in gastrointestinal disorder,
hypertension, and vascular-access complications were observed between
HIF-PHIs, which deserved to be noted in clinical decision-making.