2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3705289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Randomized, Controlled Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from this double-blind randomized trial are not consistent with earlier clinical trials of sofosbuvir/daclatasvir. 7–9 , 12 In a combined analysis of the four earlier randomized trials and the DISCOVER results presented here, there is no significant benefit associated with sofosbuvir/daclatasvir on hospital discharge ( Figure S1 ). The four earlier trials conducted in Iran and Egypt had a total sample size of 265 patients compared with 1083 patients in the DISCOVER trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results from this double-blind randomized trial are not consistent with earlier clinical trials of sofosbuvir/daclatasvir. 7–9 , 12 In a combined analysis of the four earlier randomized trials and the DISCOVER results presented here, there is no significant benefit associated with sofosbuvir/daclatasvir on hospital discharge ( Figure S1 ). The four earlier trials conducted in Iran and Egypt had a total sample size of 265 patients compared with 1083 patients in the DISCOVER trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In early 2020 there were four small clinical trials in a total of 265 patients that evaluated the efficacy of sofosbuvir/daclatasvir in combination with other antivirals, such as lopinavir/ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine and ribavirin, in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. 7–9 , 12 Results from these four trials were encouraging. Three have been analysed together in a pooled meta-analysis, showing that mortality and time to hospital discharge was slightly improved in patients receiving sofosbuvir/daclatasvir compared with standard of care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…After screening, eleven randomized controlled trials [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] were included (Figure 1), with a total of 1,110 patients who were randomized to the intervention arm and received sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antiviral agents and 1,051 patients who were randomized to the control arm and did not receive sofosbuvir-based directacting antiviral agents. All the included trials [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] assessed and reported mortality outcomes, while nine of the included trials [13][14][15][16][17]21] assessed and reported outcomes on severe illness. In addition, seven of the included trials [11,12,14,15,[18][19][20] were performed in Iran, whereas the remaining four randomized trials [13,16,17,21] were originated from Egypt.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination therapy showed no statistically significant improvement in remission or mortality when compared to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) [32] (Table 3). SOF/DCV, however, significantly improved recovery rates [31,33], as well as significantly reduced hospitalization [34,35] compared to standard of care (SoC) control groups in two small studies. Evidence, therefore, is accumulating on the combination's efficacy in improving these outcomes and further studies may provide greater clarity on its role in treating COVID-19 [36].…”
Section: Favipiravir (Fpv)mentioning
confidence: 96%