2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30 Regmi et al detected not significant difference in OS between sorafenib plus HAIC group and sorafenib group (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.40-1.24; P > 0.05) by analyzing four RCTs. 31 Their subgroup analyses showed that patients with Child-Pugh score B (HR, 0.30; 95% CI 0.13-0.72; P < 0.05) and AFP < 400 ng/mL (HR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.52-0.99; P < 0.05) were associated with significantly improved OS in the sorafenib plus HAIC group. 31 Considering the limited number of included studies, the results should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30 Regmi et al detected not significant difference in OS between sorafenib plus HAIC group and sorafenib group (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.40-1.24; P > 0.05) by analyzing four RCTs. 31 Their subgroup analyses showed that patients with Child-Pugh score B (HR, 0.30; 95% CI 0.13-0.72; P < 0.05) and AFP < 400 ng/mL (HR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.52-0.99; P < 0.05) were associated with significantly improved OS in the sorafenib plus HAIC group. 31 Considering the limited number of included studies, the results should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…31 Their subgroup analyses showed that patients with Child-Pugh score B (HR, 0.30; 95% CI 0.13-0.72; P < 0.05) and AFP < 400 ng/mL (HR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.52-0.99; P < 0.05) were associated with significantly improved OS in the sorafenib plus HAIC group. 31 Considering the limited number of included studies, the results should be interpreted with caution. To our knowledge, our study is the largest meta-analysis comparing sorafenib plus HAIC with sorafenib alone for advanced HCC to date, and we provided more accurate and reliable evidence by conducting multiple subgroup analyses and sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, HAIC combined with TKIs can generate favorable outcomes. Previous HAIC-related studies focused on HAIC combined with sorafenib as the rst-line treatment for Ad-HCC [20][21][22]. However, a randomized phase III study revealed that the e cacy of lenvatinib was comparable to that of sorafenib for the OS of untreated patients with Ad-HCC (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver cancer is a common aggressive neoplasm with a high occurrence and high mortality, among which hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the most frequent form of liver cancer (Siegel et al 2020). Currently, surgical resection is the predominant therapeutic approach for human liver cancer, and sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, is the only first-line anti-cancer drug (Regmi et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%