2012
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of the “mother’s kiss” technique: a systematic review of case reports and case series

Abstract: Background: Foreign bodies lodged in the nasal cavity are a common problem in children, and their removal can be challenging. The published studies relating to the "mother's kiss" all take the form of case reports and case series. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of this technique. Methods:We performed a comprehensive search of the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, AMED Complementary and Allied Medicine and the British Nursing Index for relevant articles. We restricted the results to only t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has a 40% failure rate, with many children eventually being admitted to the emergency department. 5,6 Techniques employed in the emergency department include the use of positive-pressure techniques (via the kissing technique, an Ambu bag, or nasally applied pressure through a catheter or oxygen source), and washing out with nasally applied saline. Direct mechanical extraction is possible with alligator forceps, hooks, or balloon-tipped catheters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a 40% failure rate, with many children eventually being admitted to the emergency department. 5,6 Techniques employed in the emergency department include the use of positive-pressure techniques (via the kissing technique, an Ambu bag, or nasally applied pressure through a catheter or oxygen source), and washing out with nasally applied saline. Direct mechanical extraction is possible with alligator forceps, hooks, or balloon-tipped catheters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of RSCs, those correlated contexts to EP loss that most suggest strength of association, temporality, and biological plausibility are held as causative suspects (of impending and predictable clinical deficit). The case has been made that such "high rate of change" events do not require randomized control trials (Cook et al, 2012;Glasziou et al, 2007). For example, a toddler's draining/obstructed nasal passage (sudden EP loss after scoliosis correction) is relieved by the mother puffing air through the child's mouth while occluding the open nasal passage (release of deformity correction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another non‐invasive option for nasal foreign bodies is the ‘mother's kiss’ technique, which requires the assistance of a trusted adult caregiver. It is a useful and safe first‐line technique, however, is more than simply blowing into the child's mouth:
“While occluding the unaffected nostril with a finger, the adult then blows until they feel the resistance caused by closure of the child's glottis, at which point the adult gives a sharp exhalation to deliver a short puff of air into the child's mouth. This puff of air passes through the nasopharynx, out through the unoccluded nostril and, if successful, results in the expulsion of the foreign body.
…”
Section: Are There Any Non‐invasive Techniques That I Can Try?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This puff of air passes through the nasopharynx, out through the unoccluded nostril and, if successful, results in the expulsion of the foreign body. ”…”
Section: Are There Any Non‐invasive Techniques That I Can Try?mentioning
confidence: 99%