2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel combined with cetuximab in the treatment of pretreated recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
33
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study are relatively favorable when compared with other recent studies, which reported median OS of 9.1–10 months (1214). Reasons for the longer response duration in this study may be that the other studies included patients who received PTX and Cmab as ≥2nd line chemotherapy for recurrence or metastatic disease, and who had had a previous treatment history with PTX, docetaxel (DTX), or Cmab.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this study are relatively favorable when compared with other recent studies, which reported median OS of 9.1–10 months (1214). Reasons for the longer response duration in this study may be that the other studies included patients who received PTX and Cmab as ≥2nd line chemotherapy for recurrence or metastatic disease, and who had had a previous treatment history with PTX, docetaxel (DTX), or Cmab.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…As preclinical studies have shown that the combination of cetuximab (Cmab) and taxanes seems to be synergistic (10, 11), paclitaxel (PTX) plus Cmab is a palliative option after failure of platinum-based therapy, offering overall response rates (ORRs) of 38–55% and median OS of 7.6–10 months (1214). Among others, Hitt et al prospectively showed that PTX and Cmab was active (ORR54%, median PFS 4.2months, median OS 8.1 months) as 1st line treatment in R/M HNSCC patients, for whom platinum is contraindicated (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have been performed in the second line involving the continuation of cetuximab in platinum-refractory patients who have already received anti-EGFR antibodies. Promising data came from a Spanish study conducted by Jiménez et al [67] which reported the efficacy of the weekly paclitaxel and cetuximab combination. This second-line treatment was well tolerated and highly active in patients who experience disease progression after platinum-based CT, including those who present with resistant disease.…”
Section: Recurrent or Metastatic Hnsccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This second-line treatment was well tolerated and highly active in patients who experience disease progression after platinum-based CT, including those who present with resistant disease. However, this trial contained two biases: the small number of patients (only 22 were enrolled), and that they were cetuximab naïve [67]. The rationale of this recent study was confirmed by Hitt et al [68] who reported the efficacy of the addition of cetuximab to weekly paclitaxel in a phase II trial in the first-line treatment of patients with R/M-HNSCC.…”
Section: Recurrent or Metastatic Hnsccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neurotoxicity and skin rash in 17 and 12% of patients, respectively. Similarly, Jiménez et al [39] evaluated paclitaxel with weekly CTX in previously treated patients. Twenty-two patients received paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 ) and CTX until progression or unacceptable toxicity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%