2014
DOI: 10.5021/ad.2014.26.4.462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety Results of a Drug-Free Cosmetic Fluid for Perioral Dermatitis: The Toleriane Fluide Efficacy in Perioral Dermatitis (TOLPOD) Study

Abstract: BackgroundPerioral dermatitis (POD) is a common inflammatory skin disease without standard therapy.ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate the clinical value of a soothing fluid for the treatment of POD.MethodsWe included 51 patients with POD in this 8-week clinical trial. The Toleriane Fluide Efficacy in Perioral Dermatitis (TOLPOD) study had an open-label design and involved twice-daily application of Toleriane Fluide, a soothing cosmetic fluid. Clinical assessment of POD was performed with a predefined questionnaire… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other, less well‐controlled studies have evaluated topical metronidazole and erythromycin, as well as some systemic antibiotics . The clinical value of twice daily application of a drug‐free cosmetic fluid has also been reported …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other, less well‐controlled studies have evaluated topical metronidazole and erythromycin, as well as some systemic antibiotics . The clinical value of twice daily application of a drug‐free cosmetic fluid has also been reported …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, asking to avoid using any skin care may not be considered acceptable by subjects with ACD signs and symptoms. 25,26 In parallel, the tested DC was very well tolerated, with no local side effects reported in addition to its significant benefit in improving signs and symptoms of skin intolerant to skin care products or sensitive skin, which may add to its benefit and is, therefore, another argument for using a specific DC in this type of subject profile. One limitation is that the subjects were not asked to report the daily use of the tested DC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…After removal of duplicates, 563 records were screened. Thirty-two reports were sought, of which four are awaiting classification, [33][34][35][36] and 16 were excluded with reasons 2,8,[43][44][45][46][47][48]10,12,[37][38][39][40][41][42] (Appendix S3, Supporting Information). Eleven studies 6,7,52,9,11,24,25,29,[49][50][51] were included (see Appendix S4, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%