Efficacy and the Strength of Evidence of U.S. Alcohol Control Policies

Abstract

Background Public policy can limit alcohol consumption and its associated harms, but no direct comparison of the relative efficacy of alcohol control policies exists for the U.S. Purpose To identify alcohol control policies and develop quantitative ratings of their efficacy and strength of evidence. Methods In 2010, a Delphi panel of ten U.S. alcohol policy experts identified and rated the efficacy of alcohol control policies for reducing binge drinking and alcohol-impaired driving among both the general population and youth, and the strength of evidence informing the efficacy of each policy. The policies were nominated based on scientific evidence and potential for public health impact. Analysis was conducted in 2010–2012. Results Panelists identified and rated 47 policies. Policies limiting price received the highest ratings, with alcohol taxes receiving the highest ratings for all four outcomes. Highly rated policies for reducing binge drinking and alcohol-impaired driving in the general population were also highly rated among youth, although several policies were rated more highly for youth compared with the general population. Policy efficacy ratings for the general population and youth were positively correlated for reducing both binge drinking (r = 0.50) and alcohol-impaired driving (r = 0.45). The correlation between efficacy ratings for reducing binge drinking and alcohol-impaired driving was strong for the general population (r = 0.88) and for youth (r = 0.85). Efficacy ratings were positively correlated with strength-of-evidence ratings. Conclusions Comparative policy ratings can help characterize the alcohol policy environment, inform policy discussions, and identify future research needs.

Meta-Analysis of Alcohol Price and Income Elasticities – With Corrections for Publication Bias

“…The average price elasticities reported here imply that reducing alcohol consumption through price or tax increases will be less effective or more costly than previously suggested or claimed [35][36][37][38]. Cumulative average price elasticities are 28-29% smaller than "consensus" estimates, with a price inelastic demand for all three beverages (-0.30 to -0.55) and total alcohol (-0.50).…”

Strategies to reduce alcohol-related harms and costs in Canada: A comparison of provincial policies

“…Brand et al's (2007) comparative analysis of alcohol control policies across 30 countries found that strong alcohol control policy implementation was associated with reduced per capita consumption. A recent U.S.-based project (Naimi et al, 2014;Nelson et al, 2013) used a ranking approach that confirmed the main finding by Brand et al (2007), and Carragher, Byrnes, Doran, and Shakeshaft (2014) assessed the adequacy of 16 national alcohol policies in nine areas in the Western Pacific.…”

Salud global 2035: un mundo convergiendo en el lapso de una generación

“…37 Los incrementos en los impuestos también son un enfoque altamente costo-efectivo para reducir el consumo total del alcohol y el número de episodios de consumo excesivo de alcohol, sobre todo entre los jóvenes. 38 Los impuestos y los aumentos en el precio necesitan ser sustanciales para lograr los cambios deseados en el consumo. La imposición tributaria a las calorías vacías, como las bebidas endulzadas con azúcar, puede reducir la prevalencia de la obesidad y generar ingresos públi-cos. 39 Los subsidios a los energéticos como el carbón, la gasolina y el diésel están muy generalizados y alientan el consumo excesivo de energéticos y la producción de contaminación atmosférica por materias y partículas, y por otros contaminantes que causan infecciones de las vías respiratorias bajas en los niños, y cánceres, enfermedad coronaria y enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica en los adultos.…”