2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and tolerability of azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, these ndings suggested that MMF exerted positive effects in preventing future relapses and considerably decreasing disability measured by EDSS. The e cacy of MMF was comparable to that of AZA but with less ADRs [25,14,16,15,26,18]. In addition, MMF has been substituted when treatment with AZA showed suboptimal responses or patients cannot tolerate the side effects of AZA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, these ndings suggested that MMF exerted positive effects in preventing future relapses and considerably decreasing disability measured by EDSS. The e cacy of MMF was comparable to that of AZA but with less ADRs [25,14,16,15,26,18]. In addition, MMF has been substituted when treatment with AZA showed suboptimal responses or patients cannot tolerate the side effects of AZA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rituximab can bind to CD20 epitopes expressed by prep and mature B cells to cause the destruction of B cells (35). It was reported that rituximab has acceptable tolerance, reduces the relapse frequency, and improves disability in most patients with NMOSD (36,37). The target of inebilizumab is the CD19 epitope also expressed by B cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our best knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis carried out for comparing different kinds of monoclonal antibodies, using evidences completely based on RCTs. Previous metaanalyses were focused on rituximab and mainly based on retrospective studies (36,37,61,62). These meta-analyses pooled the data from uncontrolled trials with a heterogeneous dataset which were flawed with the inevitable existence of deviations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of MMF was comparable to that of AZA but with fewer ADRs [17][18][19]21,31,32 . Besides, MMF therapy has been escalated when treatment with AZA showed a suboptimal response, or patients cannot tolerate AZA's side effects 25,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%