2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and tolerability of vaginal progesterone capsules (Utrogest™ 200) compared with progesterone gel (Crinone™ 8%) for luteal phase support during assisted reproduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show a similar efficiency of both preparations, producing almost identical pregnancy rates. Our results are in agreement with other studies (32,33) reporting comparable IVF success with the use of both supplements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results show a similar efficiency of both preparations, producing almost identical pregnancy rates. Our results are in agreement with other studies (32,33) reporting comparable IVF success with the use of both supplements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results are supported by other researchers who observed similar efficacy with dydrogesterone and natural micronized P in women undergoing IVF-ET (29,31,32). Further, a prospective randomized study comparing vaginal gel and vaginal capsules for LPS showed the ongoing pregnancy rate to be comparable between the two groups (33,34). Another group observed identical pregnancy rates between the gel and micronized P intravaginal capsules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Progesterone is available for vaginal administration (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). Its pharmacokinetics compare favorably with oral administration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%