DOI: 10.1159/000419523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy Comparison of Intravenous and Subcutaneous Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Administration in Hemodialysis Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Europe and the USA, many clinical studies comparing intravenous and subcutaneous injections revealed that subcutaneous injection of rHuEPO is more advantageous than intravenous injection in terms of the improvement in anemia and its long-lasting effect, as well as costeffectiveness [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77]. In the conventional European and US guidelines on therapy for renal anemia [78,79], subcutaneous injection was also recommended for HD patients.…”
Section: (2)target Hb Levels To Be Maintained In Pd Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe and the USA, many clinical studies comparing intravenous and subcutaneous injections revealed that subcutaneous injection of rHuEPO is more advantageous than intravenous injection in terms of the improvement in anemia and its long-lasting effect, as well as costeffectiveness [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77]. In the conventional European and US guidelines on therapy for renal anemia [78,79], subcutaneous injection was also recommended for HD patients.…”
Section: (2)target Hb Levels To Be Maintained In Pd Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the apparent low bioavailability, s.c. administration of rHuEPO produces equivalent efficacy to i.v. administration, and this is assumed to be due to the prolonged absorption leading to reduced receptor saturation (Kampf et al, 1989;Bommer et al, 1991). Absorption rates of rHuEPO vary according to the administration site, most likely reflecting regional differences in blood and lymph flow (Jensen et al, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the prolonged presence of high serum EPO levels after SC rHuEPO injection do not necessarily indicate a sustained stimulatory effect on the bone marrow, recent clinical studies suggest that the rHuEPO requirement is less with the same dose given by the SC compared with the IV route [14,15]. Our experience suggests that a single SC dose of 150 units rHuEPO/kg applied once a week is sufficient to produce and maintain the required target haemoglobin levels in most children with CRF [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This route may be preferable to the IV route, allowing less frequent application and injections at home. In adults with CRF maintained on SC rHuEPO, the drug appears to be more effective than when given IV, despite the lower bioavailability [11,13,15,16]. For children, SC administration appears to be of special benefit in preterminal CRF and during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) [4,9], where a permanent vascular access is not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%