Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart SegmentationⓇ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960–0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers.

Inter-vendor performance of deep learning in segmenting acute ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging: a multicenter study

“…Brain DWI often are highly anisotropic images since the slice thickness (i.e., z-axis) generally is much more than the in-plane spatial resolution (i.e., y and x-axes). Additionally, 3D U-net requires higher memory capacity, and it might require lowering the original spatial resolution or using patch-based approaches in the network, which inevitably leads to loss of contextual information 32 , 33 . Nevertheless, head-to-head comparisons of 3D U-net and ConvLSTM U-net in segmenting stroke lesions on DWI should be systematically explored in future work.…”

Simple low-cost approaches to semantic segmentation in radiation therapy planning for prostate cancer using deep learning with non-contrast planning CT images

“…Balagopal et al reported a DSC of 0.87 by a 2-D U-Net and 0.89 by a 3-D U-Net for prostate segmentation on CT images [18]. For segmentation of normal lungs, Nemoto et al reported no significant difference in the DSC between the 2-D and 3-D U-Nets [34]. The 3-D U-Net requires a fixed craniocaudal length for the input images, and in this study it was difficult to automatically select a uniform length because the craniocaudal organ lengths were variable.…”

Automated quantification of COVID-19 severity and progression using chest CT images

“…Automated lung segmentation A deep learning approach based on the U-Net framework [16][17][18] was developed to ensure the automated segmentation of the lung boundary when there is pneumonia or consolidation adjacent to the chest wall. It is well-known that deep learning approaches are datahungry.…”