Efficacy in COVID-19 management: the case of ASEAN

Abstract

Purpose The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have been devastating to countries around the world. Much of the problem has been the need to contain the infection via harsh social movement restrictions while having the necessary policies to cushion the ensuing economic blows that follow them. This study aims to look at The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries and assess the good practices that are associated with those which performed relatively better than the rest. Design/methodology/approach The authors use data envelopment analysis (DEA) to identify the most efficient country among the ASEAN nations in dealing with the pandemic and observe their practices with regard to the movement control metrics. Findings One particular country stood out in this regard, which is Singapore. The authors observed that its social restrictions were less stringent than many others yet its management of the pandemic has been highly successful despite having had the highest number of cases at one stage in 2020. This suggests massive lockdowns may not necessarily be the solution. However, the nation did place a high priority in having a high-income support, effective public campaigning and very restrictive policy on public events. In terms of originality and value, this paper uses DEA in identifying the best practice among ASEAN countries in dealing with the pandemic, both from an economic and medical perspectives. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no other papers have used this approach. The authors hope the findings can be of some value to policymakers in designing better (public) policies when it comes to dealing with pandemics in the future.

Pandemic Preparedness: A Scoping Review of Best and Worst Practices from COVID-19

“…Among the best practices used to suppress the number of COVID-19 infections in Singapore, the authors pinpoint the following examples: (a) the timing of the intervention; (b) the contact tracing, in which Singapore had a strong experience learned from SARS and physical and operational infrastructure; (c) the revision of the Infectious Disease Act (IDA), which ensures that all measures needed to control any future outbreaks could be implemented. Along similar lines, Lee and Lim [ 26 ] put forward the idea that medical and economic measures should always come together in the case of viruses similar to COVID-19, which require containment or lockdowns to be effectively managed in the early stages of a pandemic. This approach is in line with the articles identified, which argue for context-specific measures and use Data Envelopment Analysis to show the way in which restrictions, when combined with sufficient and appropriate income support, livelihood aid, and public campaigning to inform and educate, made countries perform better from both economic and medical perspectives.…”