2007
DOI: 10.1515/cclm.2007.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of a new blocker against anti-ruthenium antibody interference in the Elecsys free triiodothyronine assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Elecsys ® FT 4 and FT 3 are competitive assays, where ruthenium-chelates are attached to a monomeric test antibody. Antibodies against such chelate-complexes were shown as a cause of analytical interference [38]. Antibody-ruthenium interactions were described mostly for FT 4 [31,37,[39][40][41] and FT 3 [37][38][39][40], but recently also for TSH [40], but never appearing as macro-TSH, as in our patient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In contrast, Elecsys ® FT 4 and FT 3 are competitive assays, where ruthenium-chelates are attached to a monomeric test antibody. Antibodies against such chelate-complexes were shown as a cause of analytical interference [38]. Antibody-ruthenium interactions were described mostly for FT 4 [31,37,[39][40][41] and FT 3 [37][38][39][40], but recently also for TSH [40], but never appearing as macro-TSH, as in our patient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…They include non-specific antibodies, often called heterophile antibodies, and other miscellaneous antibodies directed at reagent immunoglobulins (Kricka, 1999), biotin (Dale et al, 1994), or other epitopes (Levinson and Miller, 2002; Sapin et al, 2007). Other proteins in plasma that interfere with immunoassays and cause non-specific aggregation could also be included in this category simply due to our lack of biochemical understanding of these interferences.…”
Section: Immunoassays Are Imperfectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between our findings and the immunoassays in other laboratories led to the conclusion that the results were due to another interfering factor. Because the fT3 assay is known to be sensitive to antiruthenium antibodies, 5,6 the samples of these two women were analysed in Roche Diagnostics Laboratory. In both patients, an interference against ruthenium label was detected, explaining the interference in our fT3 and fT4 assays.…”
Section: Two Cases Of Antiruthenium Antibody Interference In Modular mentioning
confidence: 99%