ObjectivesEndoscopic management of unresectable hilar malignant biliary obstruction (HMBO) is technically challenging, and effectiveness of stent‐in‐stent using large‐cell, metal stents was reported. A new, large‐cell stent with a 6F tapered delivery system was recently developed. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of slim‐delivery and conventional large‐cell stents.MethodsThis was a multicenter retrospective comparative study of stent‐in‐stent methods using slim‐delivery stents (Niti‐S Large Cell SR Slim Delivery [LC slim‐delivery]) and conventional stents (Niti‐S large‐cell D‐type; LCD) for unresectable HMBO.ResultsEighty‐three patients with HMBO were included; 31 LC slim‐delivery and 52 LCD. Overall technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 90% in LC slim‐delivery group and 98% and 88% in LCD group. Use of the LC slim‐delivery was associated with shorter stent placement time in the multiple regression analysis, with a stent placement time of 18 and 23 min in LC slim‐delivery and LCD groups, respectively. The early adverse event (AE) rate of LC slim‐delivery was 10%, with no cholangitis or cholecystitis as compared to 23% in the LCD group. Recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rates and time to RBO were comparable between the two groups: 35% and 44%, and 8.5 and 8.0 months in LC slim‐delivery and LCD groups, respectively. The major cause of RBO was tumor ingrowth (82%) in the LC slim‐delivery group and sludge (43%) and ingrowth (48%) in LCD group.ConclusionStent‐in‐stent methods using LC slim‐delivery shortened stent placement time with low early AE rates and comparable time to RBO in patients with HMBO.