2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After disease has spread beyond the uterus, the likelihood of achieving long-term survival is low with current therapeutics. 18 Bogani et al 19 evaluated the efficacy of ACT, but disease-free survival (DFS) was not improved. Notably, patients undergoing chemotherapy experienced no survival benefit compared with patients who underwent observation only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After disease has spread beyond the uterus, the likelihood of achieving long-term survival is low with current therapeutics. 18 Bogani et al 19 evaluated the efficacy of ACT, but disease-free survival (DFS) was not improved. Notably, patients undergoing chemotherapy experienced no survival benefit compared with patients who underwent observation only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are limited studies examining the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in early‐stage LMS. A recent systematic meta‐analysis of literature that included five studies (total 360 patients) found no benefit in PFS in patients who received chemotherapy compared with the radiotherapy or observation groups . Included in this analysis is the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study comparing single agent doxorubicin in a small randomized controlled trial in patients with LMS and carcinosarcoma, with or without radiation, and found lower rates of recurrence but no difference in PFS or OS .…”
Section: Management Of Early‐stage Uterine Lmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ULMS has poor prognosis and high recurrence rate [ 2 – 4 ]. Currently, the treatment of ULMS is mostly by surgery with some adjuvant therapies, such as cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy [ 5 – 7 ]. Due to the complex molecular heterogeneity of ULMS and unavailability of targeted therapeutic methods, the five-year survival rate of ULMS is still low [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%