2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of brief motivational intervention in reducing binge drinking in young men: A randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence suggests that this technique is effective in reducing alcohol use of binge drinkers and levels of alcohol-related harm (Bernstein et al, 2010;Daeppen et al, 2011;Patton et al, 2014). This has also been demonstrated within group sessions (LaBrie et al, 2006), particularly when comparing motivational interviewing with information only sessions (LaChance et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Evidence suggests that this technique is effective in reducing alcohol use of binge drinkers and levels of alcohol-related harm (Bernstein et al, 2010;Daeppen et al, 2011;Patton et al, 2014). This has also been demonstrated within group sessions (LaBrie et al, 2006), particularly when comparing motivational interviewing with information only sessions (LaChance et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Proclivities can be discussed during therapy sessions, especially brief low-intensity interventions (e.g., motivational interviewing [MI]), generally considered appropriate for dealing with AUDs . Self-help and formal treatment, though generally efficacious (Foxcroft, Lister-Sharp, & Lowe, 1997;Morgenstern, Wiborg, Isensee, & Hanewinkel, 2009;Raistrick et al, 2006), especially in hazardous and harmful drinkers (Beckham, 2007;Daeppen et al, 2011;Lundahl, Kunz, Brownell, Tollefson, & Burke, 2010;Sandbaek, Lauritzen, & Christensen, 2005), can produce ambiguous results in dependent drinkers (Raistrick et al, 2006, p. 99). This may partly reflect variations in the utilization of change strategies between and/or within AUD groups.…”
Section: Therapymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The reasons for these differences are not clear. It is possible that younger binge drinkers are less aware of the possible consequences of this pattern of consumption (Okoro et al, 2004), which could explain that treatments based on motivational interventions are more efficacious, especially with those who experienced certain negative consequences linked to alcohol (Daeppen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Clinical and Demographic Characteristics Of Binge Drinkers Amentioning
confidence: 99%