2015
DOI: 10.5665/sleep.5240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Internet Therapy, Group Therapy and A Waiting List Condition

Abstract: This study was part of the clinical trial: Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for sleeplessness in adolescents; URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN33922163; registration: ISRCTN33922163.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
166
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
10
166
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…9,11,13 Consistent with the goals of CBT-I to reduce time awake in bed, youth reported significantly shorter SOL, significantly higher SE, and significantly lower WASO from pretreatment to posttreatment. These gains were maintained at 3-mo follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9,11,13 Consistent with the goals of CBT-I to reduce time awake in bed, youth reported significantly shorter SOL, significantly higher SE, and significantly lower WASO from pretreatment to posttreatment. These gains were maintained at 3-mo follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…[7][8][9] However, most of these trials and existing pilot studies have excluded youth with comorbid mental and physical health conditions. [9][10][11] Indeed, to date, only two small trials of CBT-I have included youth with any comorbid mental health condition (i.e., depression 12 ; substance use 13 ). This is surprising given that the majority of youth presenting for treatment of insomnia symptoms have a comorbid mental and/or physical health condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Program completion rate was high (96%) compared with similar interventions (83%; Bei et al, 2013;Bootzin & Stevens, 2005;Clarke et al, 2015;de Bruin et al, 2014de Bruin et al, , 2015Gradisar, Dohnt, et al, 2011;Schlarb et al, 2011), which may be attributable to the increased focus on engagement in the SENSE interventions and the relatively lower levels of psychopathology among participants. Positive feedback from participants suggested the program was well accepted, particularly the mindfulness and stimulus control components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these interventions were limited in several ways, including small sample sizes (Bei et al, 2013;de Bruin et al, 2014;Schlarb et al, 2011), lack of control groups (Bei et al, 2013;Bootzin & Stevens, 2005;de Bruin et al, 2014;Roeser et al, 2016;Schlarb et al, 2011), wait-list control groups (de Bruin et al, 2015;Gradisar, Dohnt, et al, 2011), high attrition rates (Bootzin & Stevens, 2005;Gradisar, Dohnt, et al, 2011), lack of follow up (Bei et al, 2013;Schlarb et al, 2011), short-follow up (de Bruin et al, 2015(de Bruin et al, , 2014, low generalizability (de Bruin et al, 2015(de Bruin et al, , 2014Gradisar, Dohnt, et al, 2011;Schlarb et al, 2011), and/or reliance on subjective measures of sleep Roeser et al, 2016;Schlarb et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation