2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of combined hormonal vaginal ring in comparison to combined hormonal pills in heavy menstrual bleeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Menstrual bleeding was the most frequently reported VR opportunity cost, with 11 studies (nine of which involved hormonal APIs) reporting on breakthrough bleeding, withdrawal bleeding, duration of menses, and other bleeding outcomes. RCTs largely reported improved bleeding outcomes (breakthrough bleeding, spotting, intended bleeding patterns) [28, 30, 32, 37, 59, 94]; comparable bleeding outcomes between active VRs and comparison products (Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart scores, duration of menses, and intermenstrual and breakthrough bleeding) [28, 32, 64, 94]; or, no instances of abnormal vaginal bleeding [60]. An observational study reported that VR users had less frequent ‘normal bleeding,’ and significantly higher levels of amenorrhea compared to IUD users; however, it is unknown whether amenorrhea was acceptable to users [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Menstrual bleeding was the most frequently reported VR opportunity cost, with 11 studies (nine of which involved hormonal APIs) reporting on breakthrough bleeding, withdrawal bleeding, duration of menses, and other bleeding outcomes. RCTs largely reported improved bleeding outcomes (breakthrough bleeding, spotting, intended bleeding patterns) [28, 30, 32, 37, 59, 94]; comparable bleeding outcomes between active VRs and comparison products (Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart scores, duration of menses, and intermenstrual and breakthrough bleeding) [28, 32, 64, 94]; or, no instances of abnormal vaginal bleeding [60]. An observational study reported that VR users had less frequent ‘normal bleeding,’ and significantly higher levels of amenorrhea compared to IUD users; however, it is unknown whether amenorrhea was acceptable to users [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies reported non-API side effects of VR use related to vaginal discharge or vaginitis. All RCTs reported low levels of vaginal discharge and there were no significant differences between VR and comparison groups [28, 30, 32, 37, 52, 64, 74]. In seven additional observational studies for contraception and pelvic organ prolapse, 10 to 33% of women reported increased or excessive vaginal discharge [31, 38, 77, 80], and 2.5 to 3.8% of women reported vaginitis [29, 36, 42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IVRs are advantageous drug delivery systems because they capitalize on the highly vascularized tissue that facilitates drug uptake and avoids the first-pass metabolism; they are also easy to use, long acting, and are not coitally dependent [ 22 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 ]. Moreover, IVRs are established as contraceptive devices [ 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 ], are amenable to a wide range of applications, compatible with many APIs, are women controlled, and are an appealing tool for MPT development.…”
Section: Vaginally Delivered Mptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Band height was held constant at 4.0 mm and thickness of 0.0 (unbanded), 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 mm were explored. The honeycomb unit cell was used to explore the effect of band height (coverage) where band thickness was held constant at 0.6 mm and band height was varied from 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0 mm, (6). All generated designs yielded a theoretical volume (mm 3 ) and surface area (mm 2 ).…”
Section: Developing Ivr Design Librarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] For commercially available IVRs, drug delivery is enabled by API diffusion from the device, through the stratified vaginal mucosal epithelium, and systemically distributed kinetic release profiles associated with IM. [6,23] AM is the selective layering of material in a specified manner, usually dictated by a computationally aided design (CAD) file. The advantages of AM over IM for the fabrication of IVRs include the generation of complex geometries not beholden to a mold, expansion of material choice, and a larger pool of compatible APIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%