2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of commercially available vaccines against canine leptospirosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental trials of 21 commercially available vaccines found >80% protection against clinical disease and kidney carrier status in dogs (studies of vaccines designed for dogs in hamsters, guinea pigs, and other mammalian species were excluded). 37 However, trials typically involved use of high doses of leptospires administered intraperitoneally, conditions which do not mimic natural exposure. Vaccines protect for at least 12 months, [141][142][143] with several manufacturers providing product guarantee for 15 months after proper administration.…”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental trials of 21 commercially available vaccines found >80% protection against clinical disease and kidney carrier status in dogs (studies of vaccines designed for dogs in hamsters, guinea pigs, and other mammalian species were excluded). 37 However, trials typically involved use of high doses of leptospires administered intraperitoneally, conditions which do not mimic natural exposure. Vaccines protect for at least 12 months, [141][142][143] with several manufacturers providing product guarantee for 15 months after proper administration.…”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After introduction of 4-serovar vaccines in North America in the mid-2000s and subsequently in Europe and South America, leptospirosis has been recognized predominantly in unvaccinated dogs or dogs vaccinated with 2-serovar vaccines. 6,37 Although traditionally the dog has been considered the reservoir host for serovar Canicola, this paradigm has been challenged by the identification of chronic subclinical infections in dogs with other serovars, the detection of serovar Canicola in dogs with acute disease, and the identification of other host species, such as rodents, horses, and pigs, as the source of serovar Canicola strains. 17,38,39 In addition, 1 model indicated that rodents served as the main source of environmental contamination even when dog-adapted strains were present in a population of humans, rodents, and free-roaming and owned dogs.…”
Section: Because Immunity Induced By Vaccination With Current Leptospiramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it also appears that cell-mediated responses contribute to protection against some serovars such as Hardjo in cattle. In animals, such as dogs, there is currently no gold standard methodology for in vitro prediction of experimental in vivo evaluation of vaccine efficacy [ 23 ]. In the case of recombinant vaccines, several vaccine approaches have been tested, including bacterial DNA, viral delivery vaccines, live attenuated bacteria, and subunit vaccines [ 24 ].…”
Section: Leptospirosis and Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of the recombinant protein pools conferred protection against kidney colonization [ 25 ]. In metanalysis research involving vaccines and vaccination for dogs, researchers estimated a general 84% protection against carrier status [ 23 ]. The American Veterinary Medical Association explains that currently available vaccines effectively prevent leptospirosis and protect dogs for at least 12 months [ 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Leptospirosis and Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%