2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01121-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of complete rings (MyoRing) in treatment of Keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Janani et al conducted a metaanalysis about efficacy of MyoRing and considered studies until August 2017. 12 We were able to consider further studies, which were published until April 2020. 9,21,[24][25][26] This metaanalysis demonstrated that all ICRS types and MyoRing showed an improvement in visual, keratometric, and refractive values during the 1-year observation period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Janani et al conducted a metaanalysis about efficacy of MyoRing and considered studies until August 2017. 12 We were able to consider further studies, which were published until April 2020. 9,21,[24][25][26] This metaanalysis demonstrated that all ICRS types and MyoRing showed an improvement in visual, keratometric, and refractive values during the 1-year observation period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, optical results for generic rings were in good agreement with different clinical studies in which little difference between healthy and keratoconic outcomes at a population level was reported. 5 , 8 , 10 , 17 , 44 , 45 Unfortunately, clinical studies often report mixed ring typologies, corneal geometries, and degrees of pathology, and therefore results for keratoconic corneas would require of an in silico population study to fully support this conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical outcomes are characterized by a high variability, 8 thus controlling the postoperative biomechanics is a challenging issue, although several authors 4 , 5 , 9 , 10 reported that the smaller refractive correction owing to the larger diameter is not in contrast with the other observed effects. For example, the shape and size of the cross-section of the implant, its diameter and arc length (in the case of IRS), as well as its implantation position affect the postsurgical shape of the cornea and the respective refractive correction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical studies have shown that ICRS is a safe option for regulating corneal shape by inducing an arcshortening effect, reducing myopic refraction, and delaying corneal transplantation [6,7]. It has also been stated that the complete corneal rings can act as a second limbus and increase the integrity of the corneal structure [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%