2012
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of confocal laser endomicroscopy for discriminating colorectal neoplasms from non‐neoplasms: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: CLE is comparable to colonoscopic histopathology in diagnosing colorectal neoplasms, and is better in conjunction with conventional endoscopy. An endoscopy-based rather than a probe-based modality would be optimal in the application of CLE.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a post-procedure analysis rather than real-time evaluation, and the endoscopists were blinded to other information such as age of patients and results of white-light endoscopy, so the results do not reflect the reality of clinical practice. Accuracy of real-time assessment may be higher[20][21]or lower[22][23] than with post-procedure assessment. Low-quality images are usually obtained in clinical practice, but in our study, all images were selected by an experienced CLE endoscopist and had relative high quality, which may improve the diagnosis accuracy and cannot reflect the condition in clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a post-procedure analysis rather than real-time evaluation, and the endoscopists were blinded to other information such as age of patients and results of white-light endoscopy, so the results do not reflect the reality of clinical practice. Accuracy of real-time assessment may be higher[20][21]or lower[22][23] than with post-procedure assessment. Low-quality images are usually obtained in clinical practice, but in our study, all images were selected by an experienced CLE endoscopist and had relative high quality, which may improve the diagnosis accuracy and cannot reflect the condition in clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endomicroscopy is also used for the assessment of indeterminate biliary strictures [30,31], and distal segments of the lung through to alveoli [32]. It is comparable to colonoscopic histopathology in diagnosing colorectal cancer, and is better in conjunction with conventional endoscopy [33].…”
Section: B Endomicroscopy In Mismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ОБЗОРЫ клеток не окрашиваются флуоресцеином и на кон-фокальных изображениях визуализируются в виде темных пятен Показания к применению конфокальной эн-домикроскопии довольно обширны и включают все существующие в настоящий момент показания к выполнению биопсии. В целом можно признать, что даже первые результаты их применения, пред-ставленные в зарубежной литературе, впечатляют: чувствительность данного метода составила 87,9% (доверительный интервал 85,4-97,6), специфич-ность -95,9% (86,2-98,9), прогностическая цен-ность положительного результата -90,9% (89-99), прогностическая ценность отрицательного резуль-тата в реальном времени -92,2% (81-97) [23].…”
Section: рис 11 микроскопическая картинаunclassified