2015
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.5097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography for the Treatment Strategy of Colonic Diverticular Bleeding

Abstract: Objective Diverticular bleeding is the most common cause of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding, and its incidence has recently increased. However, the treatment strategy of diverticular bleeding has not yet been established. The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) to determine the indication for urgent colonoscopy to achieve hemostasis. Methods A total of 124 patients diagnosed with diverticular bleeding between 2012 and 2013 in our hospital were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, bleeding diverticula were identified on colonoscopy in 60-68% of patients with extravasation on CE-CT (positive predictive value) and 20-31% of those without extravasation, demonstrating a higher identification rate in the former [67,69]. In one of the retrospective observational studies, CE-CT significantly improved the rate of identifying vascular lesions (35.7 vs. 20.6%; p = 0.01) and the rate of providing endoscopic therapy (34.9 vs. 13.4%; p < 0.01), with a high rate of agreement regarding the source of bleeding between CE-CT and colonoscopy (κ value: 0.83; p < 0.01) [68].…”
Section: Cq9: Is Contrast Enhanced (Ce)-ct Prior To Colonoscopy Effecmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, bleeding diverticula were identified on colonoscopy in 60-68% of patients with extravasation on CE-CT (positive predictive value) and 20-31% of those without extravasation, demonstrating a higher identification rate in the former [67,69]. In one of the retrospective observational studies, CE-CT significantly improved the rate of identifying vascular lesions (35.7 vs. 20.6%; p = 0.01) and the rate of providing endoscopic therapy (34.9 vs. 13.4%; p < 0.01), with a high rate of agreement regarding the source of bleeding between CE-CT and colonoscopy (κ value: 0.83; p < 0.01) [68].…”
Section: Cq9: Is Contrast Enhanced (Ce)-ct Prior To Colonoscopy Effecmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Quality of evidence: C Strength of recommendation: Probably do it Agreement rate: 75% Explanation Three retrospective observational studies [67][68][69] and one prospective observational study [70] have investigated whether pre-colonoscopy CE-CT improves the rate of identifying the source of bleeding and the diverticula with SRH in patients presenting with acute LGIB or colonic diverticular bleeding, showing a low rate of positive extravasation (15-36%) and a low sensitivity (20-52%) on CE-CT [67][68][69][70]. Conversely, bleeding diverticula were identified on colonoscopy in 60-68% of patients with extravasation on CE-CT (positive predictive value) and 20-31% of those without extravasation, demonstrating a higher identification rate in the former [67,69].…”
Section: Cq9: Is Contrast Enhanced (Ce)-ct Prior To Colonoscopy Effecmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present review, 10 reports were selected [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] to avoid overlapping cases among papers published from the same hospitals (Table 2). Primary hemostasis was achieved in 83-100% of cases, with an average of 97% in 383 cases treated by endoscopic clipping.…”
Section: Endoscopic Clippingmentioning
confidence: 99%