2013
DOI: 10.1097/00003643-201306001-00591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine and propofol on shivering during mild hypothermia after cardiovascular surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent meta-analysis by Park et al found significant heterogeneity in the literature with respect to trial designs, interventions, and results when assessing pharmacologic anti-shivering therapies [81]. Sedatives and hypnotics including midazolam, lorazepam, diazepam, dexmetomidine, propofol, and buspirone have shiver threshold reductions ranging from 0.5 to 2.4°C when used alone and many are effective in synergistic combinations [82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92]. Analgesic agents such as nefopam, alfentanil, fentanyl, and meperidine have also been evaluated both as monotherapy and in combinations [93][94][95][96][97][98][99].…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis by Park et al found significant heterogeneity in the literature with respect to trial designs, interventions, and results when assessing pharmacologic anti-shivering therapies [81]. Sedatives and hypnotics including midazolam, lorazepam, diazepam, dexmetomidine, propofol, and buspirone have shiver threshold reductions ranging from 0.5 to 2.4°C when used alone and many are effective in synergistic combinations [82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92]. Analgesic agents such as nefopam, alfentanil, fentanyl, and meperidine have also been evaluated both as monotherapy and in combinations [93][94][95][96][97][98][99].…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, 166 trials were discarded because they were not controlled trials according to the titles, and after reviewing the abstracts, an additional 21 trials were excluded as they were not relevant to our study. We could not retrieve the full texts of three [10][11][12] of the remaining 50 papers despite attempting electronic retrieval interlibrary loan or contacting the authors. After carefully reading 47 papers, we excluded eight with no related endpoints.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%