Efficacy of Diode Laser and Gluma on Post‐Preparation Sensitivity: A Randomized Split‐Mouth Clinical Study

Kara, Haluk Barış; Çakan, Umut; Yılmaz, Burcu; Kurugol, Pelin Inan

doi:10.1111/jerd.12230

Cited by 18 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mechanism of desensitizer is by the way of occluding or sealing of dentin tubules. 1,2 Several treatment methods such as tubular obturating and surface covering procedures, adhesives, anti-inflammatory agents, and lasers may be applied to the sensitive surface after tooth preparation. 3 A durable cementation is crucial for long-term restoration survival, marginal sealing, and strong adhesion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Desensitizers, Temporary Cements, and Dentin Cleaning Methods on the Bond Strength of Self-Etch/ Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin: An In Vitro Study

Uğur

Kavut

Külünk

et al. 2021

Journal of Advanced Oral Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of desensitizer, temporary cements, dentin cleaning methods on shear bond strength (SBS) of self-etch and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Materials and Methods: Four hundred eighty buccal or lingual/palatine coronal portions of human molar teeth were mounted in the acrylic blocks. Teeth surfaces were prepared until the dentin was exposed. Specimens were divided into four groups. One group separated as control and three groups of teeth were treated with a desensitizing agent containing calcium-phosphate desensitizer (Teethmate Desensitizer, TMD), resin-based self-reinforcing monomer (Shield Force Plus, SFP) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and glutaraldehyde (Gluma Desensitizer). Two different temporary cement containing calcium hydroxide (Dycall) and zinc oxide based (Rely X Temp NE) temporary cement were applied to the dentin surfaces. Temporary cement was removed with one of three cleansing techniques: 2% chlorhexidine digluconate and glass particles containing agent (Consepsis Scrub), cleansing bur (OptiClean), and ıntra/extracoronal rotary brush (Starbrush). All groups were further divided into two cementation subgroups (Panavia V5 and Panavia SA). The SBS (MPa) was measured using a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed statistically with a four-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test ( α = 0.05). Results: Although SFP showed higher SBS, there was no statistically significant difference between other groups ( P > .05). There were no significant differences between temporary cements ( P > .05). OptiClean rotary bur showed higher mean SBS values in all groups. The dual-polymerized Panavia V5 showed the highest SBS values in all groups ( P <.05). Conclusion: Cleaning of dentin surface from temporary cement remnants with a silicon bur and dual-cure resin cement showed the highest bond strength values.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Desensitizers, Temporary Cements, and Dentin Cleaning Methods on the Bond Strength of Self-Etch/ Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin: An In Vitro Study

Uğur

Kavut

Külünk

et al. 2021

Journal of Advanced Oral Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kara et al 30 in a clinical study, separately compared the efficacy of the 940 nm diode laser and Gluma for the treatment of DH following tooth preparation. They indicated that none of the tested modalities had any superiority over the other.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Effects of 810 nm Diode Laser Alone and in Combination With Gluma^©and Chromophore on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Analysis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Tooth hypersensitivity is among the most common patient complaints caused by the response of exposed dentin to external stimuli. No definite treatment has been suggested so far for dentin hypersensitivity (DH). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the diode laser alone and in combination with Gluma and chromophore in occluding opened dentine tubules and the treatment of DH. Methods: This in vitro study was conducted on 30 extracted human third molars kept in 0.1% thymol solution. The teeth were mounted in transparent acrylic resin and the buccal enamel was cut to expose the outer third of dentin. The samples were then divided into 6 groups of negative control (no smear layer removal), positive control (smear layer removal with 6% citric acid application), 810 nm diode laser irradiation (energy density 55.55 J/cm2 , 1 W for 20 seconds in a continuous mode), chromophore (1 mg/mL indocyanine green, ICG) plus diode laser irradiation (1 W, 20 seconds), Gluma plus diode laser irradiation, and Gluma + chromophore + diode laser. Dentinal tubules were evaluated under a scanning electron microscope at x2000 magnification. The mean percentage of the obstruction of dentinal tubules was reported as mean and standard deviation. Considering the normal distribution of the data, two-way ANOVA was applied to compare the efficacy of treatments, and an independent-samples t test was used for pairwise comparisons at P<0.05 level of significance. Results: The highest mean percentage of the obstruction of dentinal tubules was noted in the diode laser/chromophore/Gluma group (65.68±12.31%) while the lowest value was noted in the diode laser/Gluma group (24.33±5.90%). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences between all groups (P<0.05) except for the difference between the laser/Gluma/chromophore and laser/ chromophore groups (P=0.20). Conclusion: It seems that chromophore increases the efficacy of the diode laser for the obstruction of dentinal tubules.

show abstract

“…Thus, a direct comparison cannot be done. Kara et al 22 have evaluated the effect of the gluma and diode laser on postoperative sensitivity. They reported a significant reduction in post-preparation sensitivity level in both groups when compared with the control.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of the Type of the Anesthetic Solution on the Incidence of Pulp Necrosis Following Crown Preparation: A Randomized Clinical Study

Karataş¹,

Gündoğdu²,

Uluköylü³

et al. 2020

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the type of the anesthetic solution (with or without epinephrine) on the development of pulp necrosis after tooth preparation. Methods: Seventy-two patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups according to the type of the anesthetic solution used. In the first group, 4% articaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine was used as local anesthesia and in the second group, 3% plain mepivacaine was used. Before administration of the anesthetic solution, electric pulp tester (EPT) and cold test were used to test the vitality of the teeth. The teeth were then prepared and provisional crowns were fabricated chairside. After 15 days, the provisional crowns were removed and then the EPT procedures and cold test were repeated. Postoperative pain level on days 1, 3, 5 and 15 were recorded. The EPT scores and pain levels were statistically analyzed. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of percentage change in EPT scores. Conclusion: The type of the anesthetic solution does not affect the vitality of the teeth after full-crown preparation.

show abstract

Efficacy of Diode Laser and Gluma on Post‐Preparation Sensitivity: A Randomized Split‐Mouth Clinical Study

Abstract: The application of Gluma or a 940-nm diode laser may be considered as effective in reducing sensitivity after tooth preparation without superiority of either method. (J Esthet Restor Dent 28:405-411, 2016).

Cited by 18 publications

References 27 publications

Effects of Desensitizers, Temporary Cements, and Dentin Cleaning Methods on the Bond Strength of Self-Etch/ Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin: An In Vitro Study

Effects of Desensitizers, Temporary Cements, and Dentin Cleaning Methods on the Bond Strength of Self-Etch/ Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin: An In Vitro Study

Evaluation of the Effects of 810 nm Diode Laser Alone and in Combination With Gluma^©and Chromophore on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Analysis

Effect of the Type of the Anesthetic Solution on the Incidence of Pulp Necrosis Following Crown Preparation: A Randomized Clinical Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Efficacy of Diode Laser and Gluma on Post‐Preparation Sensitivity: A Randomized Split‐Mouth Clinical Study

Abstract: The application of Gluma or a 940-nm diode laser may be considered as effective in reducing sensitivity after tooth preparation without superiority of either method. (J Esthet Restor Dent 28:405-411, 2016).

Cited by 18 publications

References 27 publications

Effects of Desensitizers, Temporary Cements, and Dentin Cleaning Methods on the Bond Strength of Self-Etch/ Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin: An In Vitro Study

Effects of Desensitizers, Temporary Cements, and Dentin Cleaning Methods on the Bond Strength of Self-Etch/ Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin: An In Vitro Study

Evaluation of the Effects of 810 nm Diode Laser Alone and in Combination With Gluma©and Chromophore on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Analysis

Effect of the Type of the Anesthetic Solution on the Incidence of Pulp Necrosis Following Crown Preparation: A Randomized Clinical Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Evaluation of the Effects of 810 nm Diode Laser Alone and in Combination With Gluma^©and Chromophore on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Analysis