2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of distance training program for cardiopulmonary resuscitation utilizing smartphone application and home delivery system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, while scores improved, demographic data and variables remained unchanged. Prior research by [ 13 ] Lee et al (2023) and [ 1 ] Lim et al (2022) suggests smartphone and technology-based training, like the SCPR app, may be more effective than traditional methods, highlighting its potential as a viable alternative. This underscores SCPR’s capacity to enhance competency, especially in scenarios with limited formal training opportunities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, while scores improved, demographic data and variables remained unchanged. Prior research by [ 13 ] Lee et al (2023) and [ 1 ] Lim et al (2022) suggests smartphone and technology-based training, like the SCPR app, may be more effective than traditional methods, highlighting its potential as a viable alternative. This underscores SCPR’s capacity to enhance competency, especially in scenarios with limited formal training opportunities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and it is better than no training [5]. Furthermore, the distance-learning method for laypersons showed noninferiority in chest compression depth, rate, complete recoil, and composite chest compression score compared with the traditional method [5][6][7]. However, NF2F education has some limitations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In situations where there is no direct cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training, the distance-learning method has the advantages of cost-effectiveness, time savings, learning autonomy and flexibility, and standardization of the delivery of training content, and it is better than no training [5]. Furthermore, the distance-learning method for laypersons showed noninferiority in chest compression depth, rate, complete recoil, and composite chest compression score compared with the traditional method [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%