2004
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.78.24.13819-13828.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of DNA and Fowlpox Virus Priming/Boosting Vaccines for Simian/Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Abstract: Further advances are required in understanding protection from AIDS by T-cell immunity. We analyzed a set of multigenic simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) DNA and fowlpox virus priming and boosting vaccines for immunogenicity and protective efficacy in outbred pigtail macaques. The number of vaccinations required, the effect of DNA vaccination alone, and the effect of cytokine (gamma interferon) coexpression by the fowlpox virus boost was also studied. A coordinated induction of high levels of broadly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
86
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest an important role for Nef and Gag cellular immune responses that appear to be driven by virus replication in the early phase of the infection. Similar results have been reported for anamnestic responses against Gag (Dale et al, 2004;Hel et al, 2006). However, for SIV Gag, pre-challenge, vaccineinduced responses were also found to correlate with suppression of virus replication when a DNA prime/ Nef-, SIV mac Nef-and SIV mac Gag-stimulated wells, per million PBMCs measured either 6 weeks after the fourth (last) immunization or 2 weeks after challenge, as well as the individual SIV Nef-and SIV Gag-specific IFN-c ELISpot responses measured 2 weeks after challenge, are plotted against the steadystate plasma virus load, measured 28 weeks after challenge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These results suggest an important role for Nef and Gag cellular immune responses that appear to be driven by virus replication in the early phase of the infection. Similar results have been reported for anamnestic responses against Gag (Dale et al, 2004;Hel et al, 2006). However, for SIV Gag, pre-challenge, vaccineinduced responses were also found to correlate with suppression of virus replication when a DNA prime/ Nef-, SIV mac Nef-and SIV mac Gag-stimulated wells, per million PBMCs measured either 6 weeks after the fourth (last) immunization or 2 weeks after challenge, as well as the individual SIV Nef-and SIV Gag-specific IFN-c ELISpot responses measured 2 weeks after challenge, are plotted against the steadystate plasma virus load, measured 28 weeks after challenge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Second, the B subtype SHIV vaccination may have primed a broader response than the subtype AE SHIV vaccination, as discussed above. Third, partial earlier control of the B subtype SHIV challenge virus resulting in less-profound CD4 T-cell depletion may have facilitated a broader recognition of nonvaccine SHIV antigens, although we previously showed this was not related to early neutralizing antibody responses (9). The subtype AE SHIV-vaccinated animals were remarkable for their very poor recognition of non-Gag antigens (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To both assist evaluating the efficacy of subtype AE regimens suitable for use in Southeast Asia and assess protection across diverse subtypes, we studied four separate subtype AE SHIV vaccine regimens in groups of six macaques (Table 1). We included arms with (i) higher doses on the FPV boost vaccination (based on earlier work with FPV doses in macaques (12), (ii) DNA vaccination only (based on surprisingly good efficacy despite limited immunogenicity with this arm in the previous subtype-B SHIV trial [9]), and (iii) VV prime/FPV boost (based on our own and previous reports demonstrating strong T-cell immunogenicity with this approach [4,23]). The vaccine regimens are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations