2019
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Endoscopic Resection and Selective Chemoradiotherapy for Stage I Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophagectomy is the standard treatment for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We conducted a single-arm prospective study to confirm the efficacy and safety of selective chemoradiotherapy (CRT) based on findings from endoscopic resection (ER). METHODS: We performed a prospective study of patients with T1b (SM1-2) N0M0 thoracic ESCC from December 2006 through July 2012; 176 patients underwent ER. Based on the findings from ER, patients received the following: no additional tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
134
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
134
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The JCOG0508 trial was a confirmatory study for the efficacy of ER followed by chemoradiotherapy in patients with cSM1/SM2 cancer . In that study, patients with “pMM, negative vascular invasion, and negative resection margin” based on the pathological results following ER underwent follow‐up observation, while patients with “pMM, positive vascular invasion, and negative resection margin” or “pSM and negative resection margin” underwent prophylactic chemoradiotherapy (41.4 Gy), and patients with a “positive resection margin” underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy.…”
Section: Part 1: Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The JCOG0508 trial was a confirmatory study for the efficacy of ER followed by chemoradiotherapy in patients with cSM1/SM2 cancer . In that study, patients with “pMM, negative vascular invasion, and negative resection margin” based on the pathological results following ER underwent follow‐up observation, while patients with “pMM, positive vascular invasion, and negative resection margin” or “pSM and negative resection margin” underwent prophylactic chemoradiotherapy (41.4 Gy), and patients with a “positive resection margin” underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy.…”
Section: Part 1: Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The rates of treatment‐related death following surgical resection were 0–2.0% in four case‐series studies and 1.3% in a non‐RCT (1.3%, 95% CI: 0.7–2.2%). Delayed adverse events of additional chemoradiotherapy were tabulated from eight case‐series studies and one single‐arm prospective trial, with radiation pneumonitis grade ≥3 in 1.0% (3/302) of patients, grade 3 thromboembolism in 0.3% (1/302) of patients, and myocardial infarction grade ≥3 in 1.3% (4/302) of patients. A total of four treatment‐related deaths (4/302: 1.3%, 95% CI: 0.4–3.4%) were reported, comprising pneumonitis in one, sudden death in one, and myocardial infarction in two patients.…”
Section: Part 1: Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, no additional treatment after ER with eCura C‐2 has a risk of recurrence, especially in those at high risk in the eCura system . In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, ER with selective chemoradiotherapy provided survival rates comparable to those of surgery and would be a less invasive treatment option . For patients with stage II/III gastric cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy (S‐1 monotherapy for 1 year) after surgery is recommended .…”
Section: Current Problems and Future Perspectives For The Treatment Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, ER with selective chemoradiotherapy provided survival rates comparable to those of surgery and would be a less invasive treatment option. 86 For patients with stage II/III gastric cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy (S-1 monother-apyfor1year) 87 after surgery is recommended. 13 Although there is no evidence for the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy after ER with eCura C-2, adjuvant chemotherapy may be effective for patients who prefer not to undergo additional surgery but worry about cancer recurrence (Fig.…”
Section: Less Invasive Treatment Option After Er With Ecura C-2mentioning
confidence: 99%