2014
DOI: 10.1614/wt-d-13-00140.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Fall- and Spring-Applied Pyroxasulfone For Herbicide-Resistant Weeds in Field Pea

Abstract: Field trials were initiated in fall 2011 to determine the potential of pyroxasulfone to control acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor-resistant weeds in field pea. Pyroxasulfone was applied in split-plot trials at five locations in western Canada using fall and PRE spring applications of 0 to 400 g ai ha−1. Trial locations were chosen with a range of soil organic matter content: 2.9, 4.3, 5.5, 10.5, and 10.6% at Scott, Kernen, Kinsella, Melfort, and Ellerslie, respectively. The herbicide dose required to reduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Herbicides with low water solubility, like pyroxasulfone, have limited ability to penetrate the soil profile. High organic matter will reduce efficacy (Tidemann et al 2014). For adequate control, wild oat seeds need to germinate either in the concentrated herbicide layer or within 1 cm below it to allow for effective herbicide interception by the seedling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Herbicides with low water solubility, like pyroxasulfone, have limited ability to penetrate the soil profile. High organic matter will reduce efficacy (Tidemann et al 2014). For adequate control, wild oat seeds need to germinate either in the concentrated herbicide layer or within 1 cm below it to allow for effective herbicide interception by the seedling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pyroxasulfone has a low water solubility of 3.49 mg L −1 at 20 C, and there is a strong correlation between soil binding, reduced herbicide dissipation, and increased soil organic matter content (Westra et al 2014). Higher rates of pyroxasulfone were required to achieve similar control of wild oats and false cleavers ( Galium spurium L.) at locations in Alberta and Saskatchewan as soil organic matter increased (Tidemann et al 2014). Szmigielski et al (2014) measured pyroxasulfone bioactivity across 25 different prairie soils and reported decreased activity in soils with low pH, although Westra et al (2014) observed no correlation between soil adsorption and soil acidity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite any initial injury or reduction in flax density at most sites, pyroxasulfone did not significantly reduce crop height, yield, or TSW. While pyroxasulfone can control a broad range of weed species, efficacy can be largely influenced by site-year and environmental conditions (Tidemann et al 2014). For example, pyroxasulfone had the greatest control of Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. spp.…”
Section: Flax Population Height and Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In untilled soil with more soil moisture, the effect of application was significant (p < 0.05) for all pyroxasulfone rates. Previous studies of pyroxasulfone control of wild oat in Alberta and Saskatchewan showed an inconsistent effect of application timing at various locations (Tidemann et al 2014). Lower effective dose (ED 50 ) values, indicating greater inhibition by pyroxasulfone, were observed in fallapplied pyroxasulfone for two out of five sites and in the spring-applied pyroxasulfone for one site.…”
Section: Pyroxasulfone Efficacy Trialsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…for control is critical (Beckie et al 2013). Pyroxasulfone is a soilapplied very-long-chain fatty acid inhibitor (Group 15) that has potential to be used for control of wild oat in western Canada (Tanetani et al 2009;Tidemann et al 2014). Acceptable tolerance had been reported in corn, soybean, sunflower, and field pea, while the weed spectrum includes small-seeded broadleaves and grasses (Tanetani et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%