2021
DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1976595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of five-flash intense pulsed light therapy technique in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies were excluded for the following reasons: theoretical research (15), no clinical outcomes (13), and no RCT (18). Finally, 15 RCTs 10–24 involving 1,142 patients (2,284 eyes) met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The article screening process is presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies were excluded for the following reasons: theoretical research (15), no clinical outcomes (13), and no RCT (18). Finally, 15 RCTs 10–24 involving 1,142 patients (2,284 eyes) met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The article screening process is presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Iradier et al showed that this change in osmolarity correlated significantly with the baseline osmolarity in both eyes. [15][16][17] Multiple pretreatment factors have been shown to correlate with clinical outcomes. In the present study, increased pre-treatment OSDI, hyperemia, corneal staining, conjunctival staining and Schirmer test were significantly associated with an improvement in symptoms (OSDI).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Iradier et al showed that this change in osmolarity correlated significantly with the baseline osmolarity in both eyes. 1517…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the studies evaluating IPL as a standalone treatment, 12 were randomised control trials (Craig et al, 2015; Gao et al, 2019; Piyacomn et al, 2019; Song et al, 2021; Wu et al, 2020; Wu, Xu, et al, 2022; Xu et al, 2022; Xue et al, 2020; Yan & Wu, 2021; Yang, Pazo, Qin, et al, 2021; Yang, Pazo, Zhang, et al, 2021; Zarei‐Ghanavati, Hassanzadeh, Azimi Khorasani, et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2019), and five of these compared treatment efficacy to that of sham treatment (Craig et al, 2015; Piyacomn et al, 2019; Song et al, 2021; Xue et al, 2020; Yang, Pazo, Qin, et al, 2021; Yang, Pazo, Zhang, et al, 2021). In the sham‐controlled trials, all demonstrated significantly decreased symptom score and all but one found improved tear film stability in the IPL cohorts compared to controls (Xue et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%