2022
DOI: 10.1007/s42729-022-00762-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Humic Acids and Chitosan for Enhancing Yield and Sugar Quality of Sugar Beet Under Moderate and Severe Drought

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sugar beet plants naturally adapt to tolerate salinity up to electric conductivity of 7.0 dS m −1 in growth media without a considerable yield reduction, and each additional EC unit causes a 5.9% yield loss (Grieve et al 2012). Salinity adversely affects crop growth and survival by instigating osmotic and drought stressors, which results in ionic misbalance due to high accretion of sodium (Na + ) and chlorine (Cl − ) ions, leading to specific ions cytotoxicity (Wu et al 2015b;Dadkhah and Rassam 2017;Abd-Elrahman et al 2022;Makhlouf et al 2022). When Na + accretion surpasses the normal level, it turns to be highly deleterious to plant growth owing to cell ionic homeostasis discrepancy by prompting cytosolic K + flux from cells (Shabala and Pottosin 2014;Semida et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sugar beet plants naturally adapt to tolerate salinity up to electric conductivity of 7.0 dS m −1 in growth media without a considerable yield reduction, and each additional EC unit causes a 5.9% yield loss (Grieve et al 2012). Salinity adversely affects crop growth and survival by instigating osmotic and drought stressors, which results in ionic misbalance due to high accretion of sodium (Na + ) and chlorine (Cl − ) ions, leading to specific ions cytotoxicity (Wu et al 2015b;Dadkhah and Rassam 2017;Abd-Elrahman et al 2022;Makhlouf et al 2022). When Na + accretion surpasses the normal level, it turns to be highly deleterious to plant growth owing to cell ionic homeostasis discrepancy by prompting cytosolic K + flux from cells (Shabala and Pottosin 2014;Semida et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to severe water stress, chloroplast is the first sign to be injured, since it is the master site for production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Munné-Bosch and Peñuelas 2003). Also, water deficit promotes production of abscisic acid, which reduces carbon dioxide influx and inhibits photosynthesis by stimulating stomata closure (Chaves et al 2009;Makhlouf et al 2022). The paucity of intracellular CO 2 due to extended stomatal closure causes the cumulation of ROS and damages the photosynthetic system (Laxa et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, it has been reported that deficit irrigation reduces plant growth by affecting various physiological and biochemical processes, such as photosynthesis, respiration, translocation, ion uptake, carbohydrates, nutrient metabolism, and growth promoters (Farooq et al 2008;Razmjoo et al 2008;Salem et al 2021). Also, reducing water supply caused severe depression in plant physio-logical, anatomical, and agronomic traits (El-Bially et al 2018;Makhlouf et al 2022). In the stressed plants accumulation of abscisic acid is stimulated in leaves, which sets up ionic imbalance that compels potassium ion (K + ) to leak out from guard cells and loss of guard cell turgor pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the stressed plants accumulation of abscisic acid is stimulated in leaves, which sets up ionic imbalance that compels potassium ion (K + ) to leak out from guard cells and loss of guard cell turgor pressure. Thus, narrowing the aperture mostly would be due to reduced leaf relative water content and increased stomatal closure (Abd El-Mageed et al 2021;Makhlouf et al 2022). Water deficit reduced the concentration of N and P in plant tissue (He and Dijkstra 2014) and decreased nutrient uptake from soil (Ge et al 2012;Sardans and Peñuelas 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%