2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in myocarditis: A 30-year systematic review and meta analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survival of patients with myocarditis might be influenced by disease-specific treatment (there is available data about certain effective forms of immunosuppression for biopsy-proven myocarditis) [1,23,24]. Spontaneous or treatment-induced improvement of left ventricular function was observed within a few months of the disease onset in 40-50% to 90% of patients, respectively [3,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survival of patients with myocarditis might be influenced by disease-specific treatment (there is available data about certain effective forms of immunosuppression for biopsy-proven myocarditis) [1,23,24]. Spontaneous or treatment-induced improvement of left ventricular function was observed within a few months of the disease onset in 40-50% to 90% of patients, respectively [3,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,3,[13][14][15][16] The relatively low frequency of positive viral genome in our series is promising in terms of the potential role of immunosuppression in the clinical management of myocarditis, since in expert position statements, including the most recent ESC heart failure guidelines, consideration of immunosuppression is recommended only for selected biopsy-proven virus-negative patients. 1,3,6,7,[13][14][15][16]…”
Section: Lack Of Prognostic Value Of Viral Pcr In Biopsy-proven Myoca...mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This concept holds true especially in FM where early immunosuppression may be crucial to damper the inflammatory process sustaining AM. However, most studies focusing on immunomodulation have included patients with chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy with HF symptoms for more than 6 months rather than those with a fulminant or complicated course ( 30 32 ). Though not supported by evidence from randomized clinical trials, recommendations for immunosuppression exist in the setting of complicated AM based on case series, expert opinions, and pathophysiological considerations ( 1 ) ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Lymphocytic Myocarditismentioning
confidence: 99%