Conditioning theories propose that fear of flying becomes a conditioned response through the association of flight situations with a threatening aversive event. This implicates that targeting the source of the conditioned fear is essential for exposure treatment. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the nature of threat in fear of flying, which can be external or internal. The sample consisted of 25 undergraduate students: 12 with fear of flying and 13 controls. We measured free recall of external versus internal threat words and neutral words embedded in a dichotic listening task. The results indicated that all subjects reported more external threat words as compared to the other word categories. However, the only group difference was found for the internal threat words: subjects with fear of flying recalled significantly more internal threat words than controls. This enhanced recall for internal threat-related stimuli in individuals with fear of flying indicates that internal sensations may also be essential threat stimuli to use in exposure, next to external stimuli.Keywords Fear of flying Á Dichotic listening Á Memory bias Á Anxiety People suffering from fear of flying experience an intense fear to take a flight, not only during the different stages of the flight but commonly also in anticipation of a flight.Because flying becomes more popular as a means of transportation, ever more people struggle with their fear to fly, with estimates of prevalence ranging from 10 to 40% of the general population (Van Gerwen et al. 1997).Limited research has been done on underlying mechanisms in fear of flying, with most of the research efforts relating to the treatment of the disorder. This is unfortunate because in order to effectively treat the disorder, knowledge on its causal and maintaining factors is essential. In line with conditioning theories of the etiology of fear, flying becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS) when it is paired or associated with a threatening aversive event (the unconditioned stimulus or UCS) such as an accident, which inherently produces fear [unconditioned reaction (UCR)]. Simply taking a flight will subsequently also elicit fear as a conditioned reaction (or CR). However, this account has some limitations, which also relate to more general criticisms formulated to conditioning theory (Davey 1999). First, not everyone with fear of flying has experienced threatening, aversive or traumatic events while flying. In fact, there a not enough aircraft-related incidents to explain the high prevalence of fear of flying in the general population. Second, not everyone who has experienced aversive events while flying develops fear of flying. For instance, a study by Wilhelm and Roth (1997) has shown that controls cite more flight-related aversive events than flight phobic subjects do. These limitations of conditioning theory to explain the origin fear of flying show that there might be other sources of conditioned fear than the abovementioned external aversive unconditioned stimuli. Alternativel...