1998
DOI: 10.1093/ee/27.6.1473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Maxforce Bait for Control of the Argentine Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Haleakala National Park, Maui, Hawaii

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, light sensitivity may be offset if bait is rapidly harvested and stored after application. As reported for other pest ants (Krushelnycky and Reimer 1998, Klotz et al 2000, Silverman and Roulston 2003, we saw no difference in bait performance whether granules were scattered or distributed in clumps. Accordingly, it appears that P. chinensis adjust foraging behavior to resource availability regardless of bait placement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, light sensitivity may be offset if bait is rapidly harvested and stored after application. As reported for other pest ants (Krushelnycky and Reimer 1998, Klotz et al 2000, Silverman and Roulston 2003, we saw no difference in bait performance whether granules were scattered or distributed in clumps. Accordingly, it appears that P. chinensis adjust foraging behavior to resource availability regardless of bait placement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…P. chinensis workers are solitary foragers but exploit large immobile food resources using a unique behavior, tandem carrying, in which individual workers carry nestmates to food resources (Guenard and Silverman 2011). While the relative effectiveness of clumped versus scattered granular bait against mass-recruiting species has been investigated (Krushelnycky and Reimer 1998, Klotz et al 2000, Silverman and Roulston 2003, bait distribution procedures have not been explored against solitary foraging or tandem-carrying pest ants. Solitary foraging ant species may be less likely to retrieve discrete compared with scattered food (bait) sources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New entrances to ant colonies appear within 10 m of the original baited colony between a few days to several months after baiting, and other colonies may reappear within several months at the same site, showing that not all queens were killed [30]. Similar results with hydramethynon baits were reported for L. humile in Hawaii [9] and the lack of eradication was attributed to moldy bait, UV exposure and degradation of hydramthylnon, and the rapid speed of toxicity [9]. The difference in toxicant load between dead and live queens may also explain the resurgence of ants treated with hydramethylnon baits in the field.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…It replaces native ant species in these environments, presenting a hazard to pollination of native plants, and represents a major threat to native animals through ecosystem degradation [7-9]. As an invading species, a colony can expand the local infested zone by 16 to 30 m per year in linear directions [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an insect control perspective, this predicts that toxic baits should be more effective at controlling ant colonies when the baits are clumped. Two studies, Krushelnycky and Reimer (1998) and Klotz et al (2000), however, reported no differences in Argentine ant population reductions when hydramethylnon granules were scattered within the antsÕ foraging domain versus placed in piles or bait dispensers. Consequently, we investigated retrieval rates of clumped versus dispersed insecticide granules by Argentine ants in the laboratory to determine whether shifts in foraging strategy might be resource-dependent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%