2021
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.73094.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cells in preclinical models of necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review protocol

Abstract: Introduction: Necrotizing enterocolitis is an acute inflammatory disease of the intestine that can lead to necrosis and bowel perforation. It is a severe complication of preterm birth. It’s mortality rate is up to 50% and survival after necrotizing enterocolitis leads to long-term complications. The current treatment is supportive and includes bowel rest and decompression and antibiotics. Thus, new treatments are necessary to reduce mortality and morbidity. Mesenchymal stromal cells are known to have anti-infl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of preclinical studies is typically rather heterogeneous. Therefore, a risk of bias assessment is evaluated using tools such as the SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies [ 20 ], the revised Cochrane’s risk of bias evaluation tool (RoB-2) [ 21 ] or ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies [ 22 ] to indicate low, high or unclear risk of bias for the description of the host animals’ characteristics, randomization process, blinding of group allocation and outcome measurement and completeness of outcome data reporting [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of preclinical studies is typically rather heterogeneous. Therefore, a risk of bias assessment is evaluated using tools such as the SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies [ 20 ], the revised Cochrane’s risk of bias evaluation tool (RoB-2) [ 21 ] or ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies [ 22 ] to indicate low, high or unclear risk of bias for the description of the host animals’ characteristics, randomization process, blinding of group allocation and outcome measurement and completeness of outcome data reporting [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%