1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00365-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of methods for determining ovulation in a natural family planning program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…pills, Depo-Provera) in the past month and, on the basis of a nationally marketed ovulation detector (Ovusign), all were judged to have experienced a lutenizing hormone (LH) surge (preceding ovulation by 24-48 h in most instances) between 5 days after and 1 day before participating in one questionnaire session (see below). Two recent studies found that ovulation detection kits that, like ours, use a urinary stick to detect an LH surge, yielded 97-100% concordance with actual ovulation detected by ultrasonography, much higher than tests using cervical mucus, basal body temperature, or salivary ferning (Guida et al 1999;Guermandi et al 2001). Of a larger sample recruited for the study (n = 118), 28 showed no evidence of surging within 5 days, 12 showed no evidence of surging but did not report for testing on one or more of the 5 days, 22 failed to complete the multisession study (e.g.…”
Section: (A) Participantsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…pills, Depo-Provera) in the past month and, on the basis of a nationally marketed ovulation detector (Ovusign), all were judged to have experienced a lutenizing hormone (LH) surge (preceding ovulation by 24-48 h in most instances) between 5 days after and 1 day before participating in one questionnaire session (see below). Two recent studies found that ovulation detection kits that, like ours, use a urinary stick to detect an LH surge, yielded 97-100% concordance with actual ovulation detected by ultrasonography, much higher than tests using cervical mucus, basal body temperature, or salivary ferning (Guida et al 1999;Guermandi et al 2001). Of a larger sample recruited for the study (n = 118), 28 showed no evidence of surging within 5 days, 12 showed no evidence of surging but did not report for testing on one or more of the 5 days, 22 failed to complete the multisession study (e.g.…”
Section: (A) Participantsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…An algorithm based on the ratio of these steroid hormones provides a robust measure of the timing of ovulation. This ratio measure has been validated against the urinary peak of luteinizing hormone (LH) [4], which is one of the most accurate markers of ovulation [5]. Using the steroid ratio measure, we estimated day of ovulation in 696 cycles from 213 women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent study evaluated urinary LH, salivary ferning, beta-glucuronidase, the shift of BBT, and the peak in cervical mucus with the estimated day of ovulation with 40 women enrolled in a natural family planning (NFP) program [8]. The estimated day of ovulation was the ultrasonic diagnosis of ovulation (i.e., follicular collapse).…”
Section: Published Research On the Accuracy Of Self-detected Pdmentioning
confidence: 99%