2019
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of modified chin tuck against resistance exercise using hand‐free device for dysphagia in stroke survivors: A randomised controlled trial

Abstract: Background Chin tuck against resistance exercise was recently reported as a novel method for improving the swallowing function of patients with post‐stroke dysphagia. However, as this exercise involves holding and fixing the device using the hand, physically weak patients may find it difficult to perform it. Objectives This study aimed to investigate the effect of modified chin tuck against resistance (mCTAR) exercise on patients with post‐stroke dysphagia. Methods In total, 30 patients with dysphagia were rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In interventions using a flexible resistance bar or another resistant elastic tool, the exercise is performed by placing a bar or tool on the chin, chest or neck to maintain proper posture and pulling the chin down against the chin pad. In CTAR with a flexible resistance bar, Park et al 9 used a flexible resistance bar that was maintained in the proper position by hand, and Kim et al 13 used a flexible resistance bar that was fixed to the table without requiring the use of a hand. Park et al 12 used game‐based CTAR training with a hand‐held resistance bar and sensor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In interventions using a flexible resistance bar or another resistant elastic tool, the exercise is performed by placing a bar or tool on the chin, chest or neck to maintain proper posture and pulling the chin down against the chin pad. In CTAR with a flexible resistance bar, Park et al 9 used a flexible resistance bar that was maintained in the proper position by hand, and Kim et al 13 used a flexible resistance bar that was fixed to the table without requiring the use of a hand. Park et al 12 used game‐based CTAR training with a hand‐held resistance bar and sensor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two articles [95,96] examined effects of jaw opening exercise on hyoid movement and reported significant increases in hyoid elevation (p<0.05). Other articles in this category looked at Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) [108] ratings [94,97], laryngeal elevation and epiglottic closure [91]. Articles in this category had a wide range of methodologies in treatment administration and outcome measurement, making it difficult to make comparisons regarding exercise dosing and statistical findings.…”
Section: Mandible Exercisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All included studies evaluated patients diagnosed with stroke. A total of 12 different therapies have been studied with a variety of study designs: [1] electrical stimulation (n = 14; 36.8% of the total) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] , [2] transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques (n = 3; 7.9%) [21][22][23] , [3] active pharyngeal electrostimulation (n = 3; 7.9%) [24][25][26] , [4] exercises with Mendelsohn maneuver (n = 2; 5.3%) 27,28 , [5] transcranial direct current stimulation (n = 3; 7.9%) [29][30][31] , [6] CTAR exercise (n = 5; 13.6%) [32][33][34][35][36] , [7] Shaker exercise (n = 2; 5.3%) 33,37 , [8] acupuncture (n = 3; 7.9%) [38][39][40] , [9] resistance to tongue pressure (n = 2; 5.3%) 41,42 , [10] modified jaw opening exercise (n = 1; 2.6%) 43 and [11] ce...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%