2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with or without pertuzumab in patients with stage II and III HER2-positive breast cancer: a nationwide cohort analysis of pathologic response and 5-year survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Pertuzumab received FDA approval in 2013 for HER2-positive patients based on pCR criteria, in the absence of long-term data in the neoadjuvant setting. 15 In our study, it has been shown that among patients who achieved a pCR, patients with stage III or more or those who have undergone mastectomy as opposed to breast conservation are at an increased risk of developing metastasis after a pathological complete response. Also, patients with T1 tumors had more recurrence than T2 and T3, the reason being that in our data, 81% of patients with T1 tumors had aggressive biology, Her2 positive and triple negative (Table 2 and Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For example, Pertuzumab received FDA approval in 2013 for HER2-positive patients based on pCR criteria, in the absence of long-term data in the neoadjuvant setting. 15 In our study, it has been shown that among patients who achieved a pCR, patients with stage III or more or those who have undergone mastectomy as opposed to breast conservation are at an increased risk of developing metastasis after a pathological complete response. Also, patients with T1 tumors had more recurrence than T2 and T3, the reason being that in our data, 81% of patients with T1 tumors had aggressive biology, Her2 positive and triple negative (Table 2 and Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Despite taking measures to ensure adequate matching, cases and controls differed with respect to chemotherapy regimens, tumor grade and nodal stage. Given that anthracycline-based treatment was preferred as a chemotherapy regimen in the Netherlands during the study period, the majority of control patients had received anthracyclines, which made perfect matching impossible, and also affected the matching of the other clinical variables [ 36 ]. In addition, tumor grade was only available after case–control selection and thus not accounted for during matching.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TPC combination is also associated with an improvement of clinical and societal outcomes. In particular, TPC is associated with a reduction of days of work lost due to progressive disease, because of the estimated reduction in the rate of distant recurrences and improved prognosis with an increase of QALY [ 9 , 42 , 43 ]. In addition, the estimated higher rate of pCR with use of neadjuvant TPC will derive a limited use of T-DM1, as escalating treatment in the adjuvant setting, with a substantial benefit for the quality of life of the patients [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%