2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0976-5662(11)60036-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of occupational therapy and serial casting in lower limbs of cerebral palsy children administered with phenol nerve block

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…all children diagnosed with CP) from which they were recruited (item #11) and to the same manner, no subjects who participated, represented the entire population from which they were recruited (item #12). Nine studies were deemed to have poor methodological quality [29,47,50,51,[54][55][56][57]59], eleven studies were deemed to have fair methodological quality [15, 16, 22, 28, 39, 44-46, 49, 53, 58] and five studies were found to have good methodological quality [11,31,48,52,60]. When critically appraising the internal validity of studies, items relevant to the recruitment period of participants (item #22), blinding to randomized assignment (item #24) and adjustment for confounding variables (item #25) were all major contributors impacting the methodological quality studies included in this systematic review.…”
Section: Critical Appraisal Of Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…all children diagnosed with CP) from which they were recruited (item #11) and to the same manner, no subjects who participated, represented the entire population from which they were recruited (item #12). Nine studies were deemed to have poor methodological quality [29,47,50,51,[54][55][56][57]59], eleven studies were deemed to have fair methodological quality [15, 16, 22, 28, 39, 44-46, 49, 53, 58] and five studies were found to have good methodological quality [11,31,48,52,60]. When critically appraising the internal validity of studies, items relevant to the recruitment period of participants (item #22), blinding to randomized assignment (item #24) and adjustment for confounding variables (item #25) were all major contributors impacting the methodological quality studies included in this systematic review.…”
Section: Critical Appraisal Of Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of serial casting on particular outcomes were not included in meta-synthesis when the associated studies did not meet the threshold for methodological quality or when the required number of investigations for a particular outcome to be included was not met, and consequently the outcome measures that were not included in meta-synthesis comprised multiple body structure or function measures as well as activity and participation level outcomes. The body structure and function measures that were not included in meta-synthesis were: knee extension PROM [50,52,55,56], hip abduction PROM [51], Thomas Test [51], knee PROM (popliteal angle) [50,51], ankle dorsiflexion AROM [58], knee extension AROM [56], ankle angle at initial foot contact [46,49], Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) assessing the hamstrings [52,56], Ashworth Scale (not modified) [46], velocity of passive stretch [29,44], Tardieu Scale (not modified) [11], Modified Tardieu Scale R1 angle ankle DF [54], dynamic assessment of ROM (DROM) [50], reflex excitability [29,44], isometric plantar flexion (PF) strength [44] and Physiological Cost Index (PCI) [45]. Activity or participation level measures that were not included were: gait velocity [45], gait-related cadence [39,52], WeeFim mobility scale [58], the Berg Balance Test [56] and Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) [52].…”
Section: Critical Appraisal Of Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations