2022
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Oral Care Protocols in the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Abstract: Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common infections in intubated intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Oral care with chlorhexidine is a conventional method for maintaining hygiene. Recently, adjuvant methods have been introduced into routine oral care, including teeth brushing and the application of moisturizing lotion. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of VAP in critical care patients receiving oral care with and without manual teeth brushing and the ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
4

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Three studies were conducted in Iran, 3 in Brazil, 2 in India, 2 in Spain, 2 in China, and 1 each in the US, Malaysia, and Taiwan . Most studies were in English, 1 was translated from Portuguese, 2 from Chinese, and 2 from Persian . Study publication dates spanned 2009 to 2022.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Three studies were conducted in Iran, 3 in Brazil, 2 in India, 2 in Spain, 2 in China, and 1 each in the US, Malaysia, and Taiwan . Most studies were in English, 1 was translated from Portuguese, 2 from Chinese, and 2 from Persian . Study publication dates spanned 2009 to 2022.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the outcomes of hospital length of stay and use of antibiotics, the strength of the recommendation was very low due to individual study limitations, imprecision, and possible publication bias. Singh et al, 43 2022 Subtotal Total Heterogeneity: τ 2 = 0.00; χ 2 = 12 (P = .72); I 2 = 0% Test for overall effect: z = 2.37 (P = .02) Heterogeneity: τ 2 = 0.00; χ 2 = 2.16 (P = .83); I 2 = 0% Test for overall effect: z = 2.66 (P = .008) Test for subgroup differences: χ 2 = 0.89 (P = .34); I 2 = 0% Data were synthesized using inverse-variance random-effects models, with effect sizes expressed as risk ratios (RR). Size of markers indicates the relative weight of each study within the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Certainty Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations